No evidence that he ever existed.

There's as much evidence for that as there is that he rose from the dead after a couple of days, so why not?

@redbai There is a lot of evidence for all of it, the trouble is that all of the evidence is contained within a two thousand year old book,, of no known authorship, with only a tiny few later editors known, no original date of publication, no original surviving texts, none of the later texts matching, a long history of alterations and the four main parts not agreeing, with no external confirming sources and the secondry internal sources further disagreeing. In other words, plenty of evidence, but the worst possible 'quality' of evidence you could get.

@Fernapple its perfect evidence if you understand the psychology of eye witness testimony.