Agnostic.com

6 3

Sometimes I'm not an atheist, people are so annoying I become an Apatheist.
(Literally Wiki)
Apatheism (/ˌæpəˈθiːɪzəm/;[citation needed] a portmanteau of apathy and theism) is the attitude of apathy towards the existence or non-existence of God(s). It is more of an attitude rather than a belief, claim, or belief system.[1][2] The term was coined by Robert Nash in 2001.[3]

An apatheist is someone who is not interested in accepting or rejecting any claims that gods exist or do not exist. The existence of a god or gods is not rejected, but may be designated irrelevant.[4] One of the first recorded apatheists was arguably Denis Diderot (1713 - 1784), who wrote: "It is very important not to mistake hemlock for parsley, but to believe or not believe in God is not important at all."

Scientist and philosopher Ian von Hegner has argued that apatheism is an alternative to positions such as theism, atheism, and agnosticism, with implications that have been overlooked in modern philosophical discussions.[4] Philosopher Trevor Hedberg has called apatheism "uncharted territory in the philosophy of religion."[1]

DragonDust 6 Apr 3
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

6 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Edit - I am an atheist in either case, It is more accurate to say apatheist is more accurate but still atheist.

1

Everyone knows the full cream muffin god fancies, and his fondness for angel cake.

1

If you don't possess belief in god/s you are an atheist.

Atheist: a=without; theist =belief in god

There are some people who have never even heard the word god or about a god, they are inadvertently atheists. Atheism is the absence of belief in gods.

In order to know, you must have knowledge, in order to have knowledge, you must have evidence. Believers believe without evidence producing knowledge, atheists accept the knowledge that evidence produces. Believers have not produced any evidence for gods. An atheist does not care about a believer's beliefs.

That is why atheists demand proof in order to obtain knowledge, and believers demand belief in order to sustain faith.

Accurate.

0

I like being a nullifidian.

0

The fueling of division and war by religion makes religious apathy irresponsible.

That fueling won’t end cuz religion won’t end.

Yes but you can be apathetic to religion in the pure sense, without being apathetic to its social, and political aims or effects.

@yvilletom Even if that was true, it would still be irresponsible.

@yvilletom, @Fernapple Ignoring the effects of religion would also be irresponsible.

1

I agree, so I thought that a comment on muffins would be more interesting. (Sorry older members you will have seen this before, its just for Dragon Dust. )

Suppose for a minute, and for the sake of argument only, that there is a god, and an afterlife, including heaven and a hell; and that the god chooses whether people go to heaven, or if some go to hell, in fact the whole theist deal. Not only that, but the criterion on which the god makes the choice is based on the type of muffins they eat. ( Note: “eat” not prefer, this is not about free will or anything like that.) People who eat lemon muffins go to heaven and people who eat chocolate muffins go to hell, with limbo for those who don't eat muffins at all, naturally.

Would that make a difference to your life ? Would you give up your chocolate muffins for an eternity of joy, and all the lemon buns after death you could ever eat ? Perhaps you would. But there is one vital thing that I forgot to mention about this god, which is that; this particular god, does not tell you about his thoughts on muffins, or how they affect your after life, in fact it keeps the whole thing a big secret just to itself, so that you have no way of knowing which muffins you have to eat.

Then in that case, of course, you could not make the appropriate changes to your life, or save your soul anyway. In fact muffins, the gods preferences and even that god, would not impact on your life at all.

The point is this. That a gods, souls, the afterlife etc. have no effect on anything, unless that god, or someone who knows, tells you about it, and you therefore have some knowledge of god's cake prejudices. Making this the big difference between religion, which pretends to offer knowledge of god the afterlife etc., and none belief which does not. Which is why the difference between atheists, humanists, agnostics and even deists, is so small and unimportant by comparison, because none claim any knowledge of gods preferences, and it is the pretense of fake knowledge, and of god given authority, which makes the big difference. Compared with that the differences between atheist and agnostic, even deist, and the existence or none existence of god, are trivial to the point of vanishing. And since I can not disprove god, but I can see the nonsense of Bibles and myths, good enough.

For lemon muffins? Nope though unlike many any afterlife at all, especially an 'eternal' one sounds like it'll be hell eventually and assuming you retain and make new memories your life is overwritten a million times. I think the life I live now is more important than some unknown afterlife my consciousness not even psychical body might experience.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:586896
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.