It takes one smart kid
5
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
1 comment
Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.'Proof' would be nice. But I'd just settle for 'evidence'. 
As opposed to fantasizing.
Remember Polonium Halos? [ncse.ngo]
When they first came out I got all excited (I was younger and less jaded).
I thought creationists might actually have something real to talk about.
But as usual it turned out to be wishful thinking.
I guess Dog is too smart to be caught (like always).
RichCC
Level 8
Apr 18, 2022
1
I remember Polonium Halos as being a standard within Creationist propaganda. I thought it laughable because it was so obscure and poorly understood. That any Creationist would hang their hat on that argument is more pathetic than anything. One should be able to come up with reams of clear evidence if the Earth was 'young'. The proposition that science should have trouble distinguishing between 6000 years versus 4,300,000,000 demonstrates a dishonesty that defines evil.
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
Share this post
Categories
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.