No, instead why don't you prove ME wrong, that you cannot make absolute statements on the subject. Of course, 'sky faeries' are fictional, ANY concept of a 'divine entity' is probably merely a product of human imagination. But that's YOUR definition of "god." What's mine? I don't have one. That doesn't mean "god," doesn't exist. Maybe we just don't understand it, that it's so beyond our ability to comprehend, no definition is possible. That's AGNOSTICISM.
Personally, I think of myself today as an "agnostic pandeist," or something like that. Just a label. I have to call myself SOMETHING, after all.
But to say the nonexistence of 'sky faeries' PROVES "god" doesn't exist is simply not true. I have far more "proof" reincarnation is real, than you do "god" doesn't exist. How do you explain how an undereducated Indian boy became the greatest mathematician the world has ever known?
No, there are far too many examples of unexplainable phenomena to say ANYTHING on the subject categorically. Explain those things away (like crop circles and alien abductions, ancient monuments and genius savants), THEN tackle the great mysteries of life.

You mean, NO 'GOD' from your perspective, correct? You're not claiming to know the absolute truth, for everyone, regardless of what they think, or what definition of the word they apply?