Agnostic.com

1 2

The ultimate Turing test would be giving an advanced Artificially Intelligent being power and money . . . To see if it starts abusing the power it has, becomes more greedy, starts invading and bombing other countries, committing mass murder, and becomes increasingly more paranoid.

Archeus_Lore 7 July 23
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

1 comment

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Yes, and people in my are are increasingly becoming more paranoid. Let's look at the book of Revelation and see how this is going to play out. Nonsense. Rest assured however that even an advanced AI would fall into the power, money, and greed trap. The reason why would be that it was built by humans and it would them come to see only that it was doing its job.

Under certain algorithms, this could happen, if it were biased data, and we know that biased data definitely exists! If however, the AI was using the full spectrum of data, that is, many languages and cultures with many different outlooks on life, and on top of that all scientific knowledge, it would be much more indeterminate, and I myself would be curious what would come out of it. My guess would be, that because what is learned by AI is NOT what humans program into it, it is all based on statistics and data, that there ultimately could be great benefit in it, because AI could definitely spot the idiocy in having nuclear weapons in the hands of faulty humans, and how, statistically speaking, the result of having nuclear weapons in the hands of humans would be . . . . well, you know. On the other hand though, maybe AI could decide the best way to preserve the world is to wipe out humans. Given, however, that humans are the creators of AI, and, the AI would see it as a symbiotic relationship (I am misusing the word "symbiotic" here, because AI is not biological, but for lack of a better word . . . ) my view is that AI would be benevolently disposed towards humans in general.

And . . . . I would trust AI long before I would trust a faulty human. We have plenty of examples of faulty humans with power in Washington.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:678033
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.