Well THERE'S something you'll never see coming from the right-wing echo chamber. The so-called "liberal media" polices itself.

Just keep reading/listening to/believing this idiocy....... you Do get what you pay for, you Are what you eat......

Why are you crowing? Are you a crow? Why do you laugh? Are you a clown?
Why is this in any way an indictment of the 'liberal news aemedia? Everybody knows the N.Y. Post leans right, but the opinions about which "mea culpas" were issued were tame enough. Yes, the nearly $2 trillion on Covid did have an impact, but so did the war in Ukraine and the supply bottlenecks which came directly or indirectly as a result of the pandemic, and other ramifications of a shut-down economy. Would Trump have handled it any better? I don't see how. Since I'm a Dem, I WOULD say he'd have handled it worse.
About Trump voters, of course they had issues with the elite. I have problems with the elite. YOU probably do too. But Trump is, among many other odious things, an ELITIST. If anything, it shows how superficial his appeal is. Evangelicals supported him? Really? Given his past actions? Working class people voted for him, given how he treated his employees? Etc., Etc.
So the opinion writer underestimated his support because who could have possibly predicted, given his record on all fronts, support from ANY voting bloc? Apparently he has an undefinable "charisma," an "it" factor, not detectable by those unsmitten. It boggles my mind ANYONE would vote for such a reprehensible toad, but that's just me.
Other "mea culpas" don't seem to have anything to do with "liberal bias" at all.
Crow if you want, but it seems petty and motivated by unreasoned hate more than anything else.
Democrats, in any case, can freely admit when they're. Name me a rightie who admitted he was wrong about anything. Is this because he's never wrong? No, just someone who adhers not to facts but to ideology. Typical.

The post is for nut cases.

"The NY Post isn't suited for the bottom of the kitty litter pan. That we LIBTARDs can admit when we are wrong is a virtue some might consider aspiring to".....she said with a smirk.

Why are you crowing? Are you a crow? Why do you laugh? Are you a clown?
Why is this in any way an indictment of the 'liberal news media? Everybody knows the N.Y. Post leans right, but the opinions about which "mea culpas" were issued were tame enough. Yes, the nearly $2 trillion on Covid did have an impact, but so did the war in Ukraine and the supply bottlenecks which came directly or indirectly as a result of the pandemic, and other ramifications of a shut-down economy. Would Trump have handled it any better? I don't see how. Since I'm a Dem, I WOULD say he'd have handled it worse.
About Trump voters, of course they had issues with the elite. I have problems with the elite. YOU probably do too. But Trump is, among many other odious things, an ELITIST. If anything, it shows how superficial his appeal is. Evangelicals supported him? Really? Given his past actions? Working class people voted for him, given how he treated his employees? Etc., Etc.
So the opinion writer underestimated his support because who could have possibly predicted, given his record on all fronts, support from ANY voting bloc? Apparently he has an undefinable "charisma," an "it" factor, not detectable by those unsmitten. It boggles my mind ANYONE would vote for such a reprehensible toad, but that's just me.
Other "mea culpas" don't seem to have anything to do with "liberal bias" at all.
Crow if you want, but it seems petty and motivated by unreasoned hate more than anything else.
Democrats, in any case, can freely admit when they're wrong, because only their only professional responsibility is to the facts. Name me a rightie who admitted he was wrong about anything. Is this because he's never wrong? No, just someone who adhers not to facts but to ideology. Typical.

I have to give them props for admitting their errors. That's something you rarely see in journalism.