You label yourself.

@MetalHeadJason ??????? Please explain this, it means nothing to me...?

@AnneWimsey look at your profile...

I'm pointing out that people don't know what the word really means...

@MetalHeadJason I get that and that's fine. I am pointing out that there is another category into the possibilities that is usually overlooked

I'm agnostic by profession. We can only have "faith" in our belief that anything is real since the world occurs only in our brains, our beliefs depending on incoming data converted to brain "impulses." The only fundamental reality is what in quantum mechanics is called the "probability density" (which can look like the IQ bell curve you know from high school). On the basis of experience and collected data:

>> The probability that the big orange thing in the sky is the sun is very high, close to the center peak of the probability curve.

>> The probability that a human is the son of god but at the same time is god, dies, comes back to life and then physically ascends to "heaven" is not supported by our experience or collected data. Its probability is in the very skinny "tail" of the probability distribution, its probability of being true very, very low. But there is still the possibility that such a thing is true, however incredibly improbable.

Since we don't have all the data in the universe, we can only be agnostic -- i.e., "without knowledge" -- about everything and "believe" accordingly.

Well yes, I was taught that all science is hypothesis. Those tested: as real as we get, but new data can always change things, just like logical people's views on the world if they allow new data to update their paradigm. This is why I find it amusing when people talk about facts and poo poo theories, without theories there would be nothing to test and therefore no, so called, facts. My science teacher was pretty brilliant.