They did not put warning labels on the experimental mRNA injections, or provide proper informed consent. It will be Darwinism in action as so many of the jabbed and boosted have 'Died Suddenly'.

@BDair - Fake News... get real

It's a Sad, Sad, Sad, SADS World.

Stay willfully ignorant if you wish. The Nobel prize winning Ivermectin has been administered to billions of people with great efficacy in many treatment protocols while having a safety profile with less side effects than Tylenol.

Perhaps you have twenty minutes to become better informed.

@BDair [reuters.com]

@TheMiddleWay
Since it was approved for use in humans in 1987 billions of doses have been administered around the planet. It is credited with eradicating several diseases and parasites.
There is one and only one reason it has not been approved for CV19 in the US, even though it has been proven effective and has been utilized effectively in prevention and treatment in many countries. That reason is $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$. If the doctors that successfully treated thousands of patients with protocols using IVM, Zinc, and Azythromicin were right there would have been no reason to push experimental mRNA injections on everyone with an Emergency Use Authorization. None of the vaccines are technically FDA approved in the US. Ivermectin is, and has been since 1987.
"William Campbell and Satoshi Ōmura won the 2015 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for its discovery and applications. It is on the World Health Organization's List of Essential Medicines and is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as an antiparasitic agent. In 2018, it was the 420th most commonly prescribed medication in the United States, with more than 100,000 prescriptions. It is available as a generic medicine."

Statistically significant improvements are seen for mortality, ventilation, ICU admission, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance. All remain significant after exclusions. 58 studies from 52 independent teams in 22 different countries show statistically significant improvements in isolation (40 primary outcome, 38 most serious outcome).
•Meta analysis using the most serious outcome shows 62% [51‑70%] and 83% [74‑89%] improvement for early treatment and prophylaxis, with similar results after exclusion based sensitivity analysis, for primary outcomes, for peer-reviewed studies, and for RCTs.
•Results are very robust — in worst case exclusion sensitivity analysis 58 of 92 studies must be excluded to avoid finding statistically significant efficacy.
[ivmmeta.com]

@Mofo1953 Reuters is not credible, they only offer strawman arguments and avoid the facts.
A five-day course of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 may reduce the duration of illness -
[pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]

@BDair right, but you tube is. Please. So here's the latest on ivermectin, it doesn't help. All long term studies reported along. Try to read the Reuters article, otherwise you're doing what your original post said.

@BDair did you read this on the first page of your link? "Larger trials will be needed to confirm these preliminary findings." The preliminary study from India is two years old dude, newer final studies show ivermectin is not effective treating COVID-19. It will help you get rid of lice though.

@TheMiddleway What you are not able to comprehend is that you are looking at a study that was designed to fail. And there are many of them that have been created for HCQ and IVM. They are fraudulent to say the least.If you are given a course of antibiotics, are you given a minimal dose for five days and call it good? There are proven protocols that doctors that are actually treating patients with. They do not involve IVM alone, but with zinc which gets the IVM into the cells, and other things like Z-Pac. Big Pharma stood to make billions of dollars off of their unapproved and untested mRNA vaccines, and they did. They are able to control all of the content you see from the CDC, NIH, Youtube, Fascistbook, and all other mainstream media channels.You are not getting a balanced perspective from these sources.

@TheMiddleWay @Mofo1953 You seem to be very naive and accepting your Vaccine Apologist indoctrination without question.

@BDair listen you dumb motherfucker, nobody indoctrinates me, you on the other hand seem to believe stupid conspiracy crap, with zero real evidence whatsoever, except misinformation bullshit found in social media. Had you bothered to read the Reuters link, you would have seen that the Nobel prize awarded to the doctors who developed ivermectin was given in 2015, and not for COVID 19, which as the name indicates, was a virus identified in 2019. Now don't talk to me about your imbecilic posts until you do something helpful to humanity, as I suggested before, given your immunity you should volunteer to take care of terminal COVID patients without wearing mask you yourself said that you only used masks grocery shopping, so put up or shut the fuck up.

@Mofo1953 No one ever said that Ivermectin won the Nobel prize for Covid treatment. The point is that its discoverer and developer shared a Nobel because Ivermectin was used safely and effectively for many indications. Reuters is using its usual strawman approach, and does not address the fact that Ivermectin was proven to be effective as an antiviral in addition to its antiparasitic properties. This is proven in studies and in practice in many parts of the world. It has recently shown promise in fighting cancers. None of this is theory. It is all well supported in the medical literature. I am sorry you have to live with such an ill temperament, perhaps some relaxing chamomile tea would be helpful.

@BDair fuck off asshole, I told you do not talk to me unless you volunteer, have you? Right, that you ignore, figures, an immune coward.

English Mofo, do you speak it?

Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of
Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19
[covid19criticalcare.com]

'Pre-Clinical Studies of Ivermectin’s activity against SARS-CoV-2
Since 2012, a growing number of cellular studies have demonstrated that ivermectin has anti-viral
properties against an increasing number of RNA viruses, including influenza, Zika, HIV, Dengue, and
most importantly, SARS-CoV-2 (Mastrangelo et al., 2012;Wagstaff et al., 2012;Tay et al., 2013;Götz
et al., 2016;Varghese et al., 2016;Atkinson et al., 2018;Lv et al., 2018;King et al., 2020;Yang et al.,
2020). Insights into the mechanisms of action by which ivermectin both interferes with the entrance
and replication of SARS-CoV-2 within human cells are mounting. Caly et al first reported that
ivermectin significantly inhibits SARS-CoV-2 replication in a cell culture model, observing the near
absence of all viral material 48h after exposure to ivermectin.'

Just my a opinion, but I think other than traumas like broken bones and other emergencies, a majority of things can be cured by alternative means. Many surgeries and medications are unnecessary and often do more harm than good.

Lifestyle diseases such as colon and prostate cancer as well as many other ailments can be cured by natural methods provided your not past the point of no return, in which case ONLY drugs and pharmaceuticals will be able to help you.