Agnostic.com

2 1

Ahhhhhhhh, so it's the lockdowns that are causing all the deaths (Don't mention the elephant in the room). Never mind the well documented side effects (myocarditis) of preventative covid medicines on the market.
[msn.com]

puff 8 Jan 20
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

The pandemic does more harm than good, it's the worst idea of an overall health model in our times.

1

The link says the virus causes heart problems -- lockdowns just make some people slow to get treatment for heart problems.

A former close friend of my father died from COVID.
He spent about a month in the hospital (some on a respirator) and thought he was over it.
Then he went home and died from a heart attack a week later.

From the link [italics added]


Doctors say the effects of the pandemic increased pre-existing risk factors with some people having a heightened risk of disease after recovering from the virus.

While heart disease has been a leading cause of deaths for several years, experts say lockdowns meant many patients presented much later with progressive symptoms.

Experts haven't had to look far to find links between coronavirus and cardiovascular issues, with one study finding hospitalisations had ballooned after the pandemic.

Is it not a shame vaccines were compulsory in places like Australia, with well over 90% vaccinated? A shame because in biological studies where a population group is being studied, 25% has nothing done at all, the control group. This allows researchers to determine if whatever is being tested actually benefits individuals and collectively, the group.
A bit hard to have this 25% control group when over 90% have taken what is being tested. Not science.
This means that unfortunately we may never discover the root cause of these excess deaths.
Have no doubt that scientifically covid medicines are experimental, regardless of what govt authority declares them approved during times of emergency. Now, we may never know their true benefit/ risk as too many have taken them during the trial period.

@puff
What? This is a gibberish statement. How many 'excess deaths'?

If i understand what you're trying to say (doubtful). Given that the whole population is in the sample, the difference between 10%(100% less 90%) and 25% isn't that large -- conclusions can still be made.

@RichCC 17% excess deaths according to the article on previous, pre-pandemic years.
You do a trial in biological science, a quarter of the trial group should be a control group, a placebo if you like, so you may compare to those being tested.
If you vaccinate the whole population, there is no control group. So to compare they will have to chase up those unvaccinated who may well be unwilling to participate in any studies considering many have treated them like pariahs the last 2 years.
Can we compare if the unvaccinated are also experiencing excess deaths at the same rate as the vaccinated? No we can't because of the mad push to vaccinate all.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:705809
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.