Agnostic.com

2 1

Even as the evidence about the relationship between economic growth and ecological breakdown continues to pile up, growthism remains entrenched. It has the staying power and ideological fervour of a religion. Of course, this is hardly surprising: our economic system is structurally dependent on growth, it serves the interests of the most powerful factions of our society, and it is rooted in a deep-seated world view of dominion and dualism that goes back some 500 years. This edifice will not yield easily.
Not even to science.

When I reflect on the conflict between science and the religion of growth, I can’t help but think of Charles Darwin: his findings about evolution posed such a radical challenge to the dominant world view at his time that they were almost impossible for people to accept. To see humans as descended from non-humans rather than created in the image of God required a total paradigm shift.

Something similar is happening right now. Ecological science requires that we learn to see the human economy not as separate from ecology but as embedded within it. This poses a radical challenge to the dominant world view, and to capitalism itself. Yet rather than accept this evidence and change their world view, those who seek to preserve the present system instead devise elaborate alternative theories explaining that we needn’t change course; that we can carry on growing the global economy indefinitely and everything will be fine. - - (Jason Hickel)

Thibaud70 7 Apr 4
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Our intrinsic instincts for migration, procreation, and expansion of resources are uncontrollable by the so-called "rational" mind but we have no more land to escape that which we've fowled. Now it's about who can bloody the others and emerge as the powerful. Neither side is going to save our species from extinction, in all likelihood, so the question of survival is not one of hope. It's merely one of instinctual drive, as well.

2

Capitalism sucked to begin with, at least in my mind, and esp. with today's bare-knuckle variety of it, coupled with globalization to back it up and make unions powerless beyond their national borders, while capital has no border restrictions on it at all. And to then add to it, it's mindless drive for growth, capitalism is long past needing to be abandoned, with fair socialism, or at least extremely regulated capitalism, that has regulations preserving the environment over profit, in some new form of capitalism.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:717713
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.