Agnostic.com

5 5

From the comments section from MedPage Today.
The commenters are medical professionals.

Why Is One Dose Suddenly Enough for the mRNA COVID Vaccines?

Quackery -
'Until a properly controlled randomized controlled trial shows that the bivalent formulation can reduce morbidity or mortality in vaccinated and non vaccinated and those with natural immunity, it shouldn't be offered to anyone.'

PHC
'That horse already left the barn several months ago. At this point neither the CDC nor the current Administration can recover from continued gaffs, no matter how they try to frame their policies as "following the science". Many of us saw enough the past 3 years to confirm their policies & recommendations were based on a political agenda more than on science. For example, the FDA reported in 2021 that the risk of myocarditis among young vaccinated males was nearly 29 times as high as vaccine manufacturers predicted. But people who raised those concerns or argued that immunity after infection was equal or better than the vaccine (before vaccines were even available) were mocked as being hopelessly stupid or members of a cult. Posts to social media & even medical forums were deleted or flagged as "dangerous misinformation". I bookmarked that FDA report, knowing some would claim it wasn't true.'

wcb45
'I agree with the commenters here. Why denigrate the unvaccinated? They may have a myriad of reasons to refuse the vaccine not related to 'misinformation'.

The current change in policy to only one vaccine dose being efficacious shows a real lack of scientific reasoning and it's that type of unsureness that causes people to mistrust the government. This has been true throughout the pandemic.'

Hillybeans01
'So the doctor who says, "In my opinion, FDA has botched several aspects of COVID-19 vaccine policy over the past year", thinks that approximately 30% of Americans have refused all COVID-19 vaccines for over 2 years for political reasons and widespread misinformation. No, Doc, they refused because they saw back then what you're finally seeing now. Two 3 letter groups who can't seem to make a sound decision and stick with it. Two groups who have continuously 'botched' things. Two groups who you think you know better than, so much so that you wrote a whole piece about it. Well, 30% of us also think we know better and thankfully, we live in a country that still affords us the freedom to act upon what we think is best for us.'

Nyla
'It annoys me when people spew “unvaccinated…..due to politics or misinformation “. Neither my husband, 66, nor I, 70, got a Covid vaccine & will not. It had nothing to do with politics. God could be president and we still wouldn’t get that vaccine. Nor is misinformation the reason we didn’t, and won’t, get it. We just don’t need it or want it. We had Covid in January 2022 and both had only a 24 hour fever & sore throat. We don’t get the Flu, Shingles, Pneumonia or other vaccines either. And really, do people believe vaccine injured people are making up symptoms & issues? There is no guarantee these vaccines are 100% safe. It’s only the word of the Pharmaceuticals that produced the vaccines and made million of $$$$$ from them.
the vaccines.'

D_H_MD
'Vaccine injury is very real. I know firsthand. It ruined my life and I have been ill for 28 months now. I am part of a very large community of Vaccine Injured individuals. To say vaccine injury is misinformation is absolutely misinformation.'

Nyla
'Agree. The adverse events are real. My BIL, age 72 now, started with painful joints….every joint…. & muscles 2 days after his first dose. The symptoms continued to escalate when he got dose #2 until he could barely move his joints or walk. These symptoms continued for 12 weeks before there was any improvement. He still has issues from time to time. His Dr told him he’d had a number of patients with the same symptoms. Needless to say, he didn’t get a booster. Also, my son, mid 30s, had a case of myocarditis after his second dose.'

Cnls
'Thank you for speaking. This portion of the article “ often for political reasons and because of widespread misinformation -- ” is so presumptuous. Many of us read the research, listened, watched, prayed, and read more research and came to the conclusion that the CONSENSUS and mandates were, in fact, political. Do not assume or imply the rationale behind vaccine refusal. I am SO glad not to have taken it.'

BDair 8 May 3
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

5 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

2

65% of the FDA's funding comes from medical companies. particularly pharmaceutical companies.

100% of all drugs tested for approval have the results sent to the FDA after the findings are identified and compiled by the pharmaceutical company and only by the pharmaceutical company.

If someone has a negative side affect, the company can legally remove that person from study for a multitude of reasons and the side affects absolutely may not submitted. If someone drops out of a study, the findings on that person can be removed or limited. ie. 1,000 people tested, 50 people start having cardiac issues and voluntarily drop out of the study. One person has a heart attack by the time the study is completed.

Result= "0.01% may experience heart complications"
Not "5.1% may experience heart complications while 0.01% may experience a heart attach or severe cardiac events."

A few studies recently completed show that the leading causes of death are heart disease, number two is cancer, and number three is long term affects/reactions to prescribed medications.

It's a rigged system played for shareholder results. I encourage all Democrats to get vaccinated and to get every prescription that their doctors will prescribe them though.

Ya made me look and I found scary stuff about who pays the FDA. 40% from drug companies.

Here's a paragraph at the end. "However, without careful consideration of what is being negotiated, the FDA can become weak and ineffective, unable to protect its citizens from the next thalidomide. There are some signs that the pendulum may be swinging too far in the direction of the manufacturers. Additionally, while drug approval functions at the FDA are well funded, the FDA is insufficiently funded to protect consumers from other issues such as counterfeit drugs and dietary supplements because they cannot collect user fees to do so. In my view, these functions need to be identified and require additional taxpayer funding."

1

People are luckier than pets. We have pros that scrutinize our vaccines and make changes when necessary or eliminate shots when not needed. It's a big political bunch of b.s. but if you were a dog you would be forced by vets to have shots from birth thru your life until about ready to die. There was no oversight, and if people aren't aware enough their dogs are still getting way way too many vaccines.
Individual States determine how often rabies must be given. Understand the first round of rabies is the same amount and type everytime a dog gets it. So they're getting rabies annually if that's all the owner paid for but the pup is getting a 3 yr adult shot and so too much.

if interested because you have a dog here's her fact sheet. Most animals are as important as people to owners. One vet, Dr.Jeanne Dodds of Harvard complied the only list of vaccines necessary and which to do without. Basically only pups need their first few vax. [drjeandoddspethealthresource.tumblr.com]

"ONE OF THE FOREMOST EXPERTS IN PET HEALTHCARE, DR. DODDS FOCUSES ON VACCINATION PROTOCOLS, THYROID ISSUES AND NUTRITION.VISIT HEMOPET.ORG OR NUTRISCAN.ORG FOR MORE INFORMATION."

1

Oh, quack quack quack. Get a life. And the doctor in you researched something and it takes years to make a real and true vaccine. You know coz somebody told you so.

I know because that is how it has worked for
every previous 'vaccine' before administering
it to the public.
Even though they have made various attempts
over the last couple decades, they were never
able to develop a safe and effective mRNA based
vaccine. They all failed in their trials, including
the current Covid biologic products. Either their test animals died,
or in cases, their human subjects died. They never
completed their safety and efficacy trials.
I am not making things up, I can back everything
with published medical literature.
You are welcome to stay uninformed and ignorant,
if that is your desire.

3

Ain't hindsight a beautiful thing? Luckily, some of us also used foresight.

puff Level 8 May 3, 2023
2

Source article. [medpagetoday.com]

BDair Level 8 May 3, 2023
Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:722323
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.