Agnostic.com

2 6

Whenever someone tries to invoke science in defense of their patently bigoted unscientific position, I'm like "Great, you just conceded the argument!"

Druvius 8 June 2
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Biology is a more pure science than the social science's. But even biology has lots of grey areas. Why Fauci was such an idiot thinking his decrees when questioned were "Anti science". If science can't be challenged, it's not science. Science demands to be challenged.
What this post signifies I think, is a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. But so is arrogance and a lot of scientist are very arrogant.

puff Level 8 June 2, 2023
0

Do those sort of arguments still get used. They were not really even acceptable misunderstandings of evolution, even in the nineteenth century. Even a reading of Darwin, at the very beginning of modern evolutionary theory, would have made it obvious they were not true.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:726459
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.