Look up cosmic background microwave radiation.

@Flyingsaucesir

Kind sir, look up EVIDENCE for cosmic microwave background radiation.

If it exists you will see the shadows of the most distant objects.

@yvilletom Not sure what you mean by your second sentence above.

The Cosmic Background Microwave Radiation is one of three powerful pieces of evidence that the big bang occurred. Penzias and Wilson stumbled upon the CBMR by accident in 1965, and were later awarded the Nobel Prize for their discovery. Later, the Hubble space telescope photographed the radiation; the image is widely known as the universe's baby picture.

Another important piece of evidence supporting the big bang theory is the red shift in the spectra of stars and galaxies. The red shift was first observed in 1929, by Edwin Hubble, from the Mt. Wilson observatory near Los Angeles, California. Hubble discovered that the more distant the galaxy, the greater its red shift. The red shift is actually doppler effect, brought about by luminous objects speeding away from the observer. Looking out into deep space, the pattern we see in every direction is increasing red shift with distance. This can only happen if the universe is expanding. This expansion is also considered evidence that the big bang occurred.

Einstein's theory of relativity, completed in 1915, predicted that we should discover evidence of a big bang before the red shift or the CBMR were discovered. Relativity
says that the universe must have begun as a single point, called a singularity. Confirmation of a prediction made by a separate, well-supported theory can also be considered a type of evidence, albeit theoretical/mathematical evidence.

[study.com].

I think there is more evidence of the "Big Bang" than there is of any god.

@snytiger6 For sure!

It was once a strong theory about the start of our universe. It is now being 'revised' and it will be interesting to see the outcome. I vote for the existence of a multi-verse. Now the only problem is when and how did all of this start!

@Flyingsaucesir Explaining my second sentence above.

Aim a flashlight at yourself through, for instance, a shelf of books. Some of the books block some of the light. A person who is looking at your face sees, on your face, shadows of some of the books.

Similarly, some of the galaxies block some of the CMBR.

The three remaining paragraphs of your post read as if you are readng what others have written. None of it serves as evidence for what you have written.

@Flyingsaucesir, @snytiger6

For sure, people have spoken and written much about gods. People have also spoken and written much about the “Big Bang”.
How much of it is evidence?

@Flyingsaucesir

I clicked on your link to study.com and in moments heard the following from King Lear contradicted. (Said with a big shit-eating grin.)

“Nothing will come of nothing” is a quote from William Shakespeare’s tragedy King Lear.

Maybe it was the singer Barbra Streisand who agreed with Lear in “Nothing comes from nothing and nothing ever will.”

@jackjr I don't expect to live to see that question answered definitively.

@yvilletom Yes, the baby picture is a bit grainy. The Webb telescope should provide a bit more resolution. As will other, future devices.

For sure on this subject I can only speak about what I have read. I couldn't make this stuff up!

@yvilletom A singularity is not nothing.

@snytiger6

The big bang and the gods have believers. Believers endlessly produce words to explain their beliefs. Their words attract money but are not evidence.