After learning that the majority of the money donated to charities ends up in the directors of the companies pockets . I find that when rich people brag about donating money is insulting as all they are doing is moving money around each others pockets . As someone pointed out recently after early 40 years in Africa the main charities have barely made a difference yet in one year a Rap artist has brought renewable energy to parts of Africa . What's everyones thoughts on this ?
Charities are like any other organization, run by people and open to corruption even in small amounts such as a CEO raising their salary bit by bit over time making far more than a charity should be paying them. Most of them have to show how much money they use to promote their specified cause and it's often pretty low. Better than nothing but how much do you think should be given on top of running and growing an organization?
Akon was devoted to the cause more than most current charities who have had personnel turnover over time. It's not really comparable but very impressive that he stepped up like that.
I read a great book about this years ago and the man who wrote it felt it was still better to support than not. But if in doubt support Rotary, it's run by volunteers, has National and International groups and no administration fees are paid. It also promotes friendship and fairness in dealings. But I was searching for said book and found this: [devpolicy.org] which seems to be saying Aid is causing as many issues as it's solving
As a rule Americans give more to Charity than Brits. I understand why but for fear of insulting either Nation, I will refrain from saying. I give where I can to things that are important to me. I had a long conversation with a rough sleeper. I gave him a couple of quid 'for a room miss, god bless ya miss', only to see him the day after still begging for a room. So I sat with him n said, 'Come on lad you know this is all going on ale...just be honest'. He agreed but told me folk look down him for being a drinker, how he'd been a painter and decorator, low mood and alcoholism had got in the way. This is the thing for me. Give if you want, as a socialist I am basically opposed to charity, but if you do give stop expecting people to be virtuous in their need. Street ppl f**ked up their life, thats why they are there. Charities exist to help the poor a bit and help the rich a lot. Alternatively fight for a just and equal society that makes charity obsolete.
Great accent... I love how you wrote your answer. I could actually her you in that accent.
@BucketlistBob hahaha
When I donate I try to find local places where I know they do good things for the community. There’s a thrift store in town that is not church related and they do a lot for people with disabilities, job placement, etc. Also the local women’s shelter.
I forgot carehelp. And boys Village and girls village.
A lot of the stores here are tied to the major charities
Yes, I used to live near a great little cafe that employed people with a disability, and I supported that. They also let you but a credit for others, so someone in need could get a free drink or food, and a book swapping shelf. Miss that place!
I think it would depend on the intent of the donator, if they are not aware of where his money ends up. That said, I remember working at Raytheon in the late 90s, when the time of the year came when our United Way cards were delivered; the options were:
Same here.... I mostly give to there red cross. After the hurricane here they actually gave me money. I think it was 150 dollars. Heck... it paid for the gas in my generator. Oil too. We were out of electricity for 21 days....whew!
Wow! Talk about manipulation.
There’s info about how many cents per dollar go to actual people in need, and how much charity directors get(rake in!).
One size doesn't fit all. I have been a volunteer worker, director and leader for charities and non-profits for most of my life. Granted this is in Canada, but i know many of my American colleagues are like me and not one cent has ended up in my pocket, or in the pockets of the many committed volunteers i worked with. And those who were paid, were generally underpaid in comparison with similar jobs in the private sector. Assumptive judgements are rarely helpful or fair.
I have no doubt that some charity CEOs make look to be overpaid, but those dollars must be weighed against their work loads and responsibilities. Do you work 20/7? Many of them do.
In Canada, and according to the limited info i have on US non-profits, workers for charities and non-profits are generally grossly underpaid.
So i say respectfully, let's not demonise a whole sector of caring, committed workers. Generalisations as usual, are as inaccurate as most assumptions.
Individual help makes a difference. Everything else is a business like religion.
Donating to charities is one of the biggest scams the rich engage in.
That, and dodging taxes.
Sometimes it's the same thing
I agree that it is a problem. You can get a list of charitable organizations that give you the salary of the CEO and also breaks down the percentage amount in administrative expenses. It is a very sad eye opener.
I don't give money to charities anymore because of this. The big charities have the biggest fat cats.
Charity is not the answer. Socialism is the answer.
Democratic socialism .....got to add the democratic as capitalists will. Then shout commies not understanding the difference
I'd prefer proper Socialism... No .. Everyone has a home, free health care... People treated with respect. No billionaires and homeless people.
It won't happen in my lifetime so I'll be grateful for Democratic Socialism, which is slightly less barbaric than what we have now.