It depends if it was put on government/public or private property.

They should be charged doing what they did only makes others look bad it inly takes a small percent unfortunately

Which offenders are we talking about, those who erected the monument or the one who destroyed it?

I agree with most of the posts here. The offenders should be charged.

Even though I don't agree with the monument , including the fact that I don't think that it was legal, I think they should absolutely be prosecuted. You can't just take the law in to your own hands, Especially if nobody is in immediate danger.

I am against crime... even if that crime may advance my agenda... we can't allow moral vigilantes or zealots going around doing their thing.

After looking at the link I see several glaring errors. The monument is unconstitutional and many of these symbols have had to be removed after FFRF sued.

This country is not governed by majority; it is ruled under a Constitution.

What part of the ten commandments do our laws follow? Our legal system came from the code of Hammurabi not some burning bush.

The legislators who voted for it should volunteer to be crucified in place of a replacement memorial.

Watch the atheists get blamed for this!

Breaking: LITTLE ROCK, Ark. — The Arkansas Capitol Arts and Grounds Commission has approved of design plans in erecting a new Ten Commandments monument outside of the state capitol building after a mentally ill man destroyed the first Decalogue display earlier this year with his car.
According to the Associated Press, four concrete posts will be installed as protective barriers around the monument to help prevent a repeat of the June incident. The monument has again been funded with private donations, including the $25,000 donated by the faith-based entertainment company PureFlix. [christiannews.net]

The crime would probably be vandalism and destruction of public property (or something similar). Yes, even though they destroyed something that many did not want displayed, what they did was a crime. I'm not sure if they'd necessarily be arrested. I think it would depend on the severity of the crime. They might only be fined.

But, even if displaying the monument was wrong, it's still wrong to answer a crime with another crime.

[usatoday.com]

The list is incomplete anyway and immoral so even though I don't condone the destruction, I understand.

I am not offended by the, so called, offenders. I think a public service award would be in order.

IMHO, no. And if they are arrested they should not be prosecuted.