25 2

Being a freethinker...

How do you respond when confronted with information that goes against things that you believe are true?

By gregoryL
Options Favorite Like

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence, and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy

Create your free account

25 comments

3

First I cuss to the tune of, "Well, fuck." Next I begrudgingly accept the new information because it didn't confirm my confirmation bias. Then I spend an indeterminate amount of time fighting my confirmation bias until the acceptance phase is complete. After that, I just complain about how much it sucks that it isn't the way I thought it was. smile007.gif

Kafir Level 7 Nov 7, 2018
Reply

Right on!

Lol I like this especially the part "well, fuck"🀣

3

Beliefs are just that, beliefs. Without evidence they remain so until evidence is shown to either prove or refute them. If your beliefs are proved to be false, then you should accept that gracefully and concede that you were mistaken....to do anything else would be wrong-headed and obstinate.

Marionville Level 8 Nov 6, 2018
Reply
2

In grad school it was shoved down our throats that all arguments needed to be evidence based. However, the problem with data is that it is sometimes taken from a sample that is only representative of a small population. I would say do your research. Ask for the sources and see if you can come up with the same perspective as the one giving you the new information. People have a way of being biased towards their own beliefs and not looking at things objectively. So I would be open to new information , but willing to actively investigate.

Naturesharmony Level 4 Nov 9, 2018
Reply
2

First I get angry. I have either been lied to in the past or I am being lied to in regards to the new information.
I ask for sources, check the sources, ask people I trust on the subject until I am reasonably certain I have gotten as close to the truth as I can with the available information; because the truth is the only thing that matters.

MLinoge Level 5 Nov 6, 2018
Reply
2

Research

AstralSmoke Level 8 Nov 6, 2018
Reply
2

I examine my belief further in a effort to find out how I reached what appears to be a faulty conclusion...and then I research some more...and then I bring my thinking in alignment with the facts.

SkotlandSkye Level 8 Nov 6, 2018
Reply
2

I apply critical thinking. Research validity of the argument presented and person presenting it. Accept it if it is true or a better description. It's quite a buzz when that happens.
I don't think I believe anything is true. I just accept it probably is until proven otherwise.

Moobellob Level 4 Nov 6, 2018
Reply
2

Maybe factual things can be handled that way but what about moral things? While there is less murder now than ever before many people think things are worse. They blame guns. More people die in auto accidents than by guns but I don't hear to call to ban autos and trucks. From a factual stand point is murder bad?

I just heard on the news (fake or not) that professionals think spanking of any kind is bad. It leads to more trouble in adults. I remember what doctors were saying about smoking in the late 1940s and in the 50s. It is good for you they said, it relaxs you... etc . I don't believe doctors today any more than doctors in the 40s about smoking.

dave1459 Level 3 Nov 6, 2018
Reply

Spanking is an act of violence on your children. That is how they perceive and receive it. The facts point to it being harmful to them in almost all cases. Smoking is proven to be a cause of cancer. Science advances. It corrects itself (unlike beliefs). Not sure where you are going with this line @dave1459, but it sounds like you want to believe what you believe and to hell with the facts

Edited

The fact is, do not believe anything you hear, and only half of what you see. Figures never lie but lairs use figures. If you realize that doctors and studies are put on for those paying for the study. The out come can be made to prove what you want. Mistakes are made, no one is to blame and no one is held to account. In the case of smoking I saw the ads with doctor's names attached.

@Seeker3CO So, all the kids that grew in the 40's and 50's became monsters because they were spanked. Clearly that is not true. Look at the people who came out of the 40s and 50s and before. It should be clear as the nose on your face that the sweeping statement is incorrect.

@dave1459 Who said ALL the kids anything? There are very few absolutes in life. But it you want to go ahead and beat the hell out of you kids to teach them, that unfortunately in this culture is legal. It is wrong. But have at it. I'm sure they'll thank you for it later. Violence is violence. And I will trust science over your anecdotal bullshit every day of the week.

2

I do not cling to personal beliefs if faced with verifiable facts that counter them.

Donotbelieve Level 8 Nov 6, 2018
Reply
1

Ask questions.

lee_man Level 5 Nov 10, 2018
Reply
1

There’s a possibility that everything I think is true is actually false. Being confronted with information is different than being confronted with solid evidence, if they have solid evidence, then consider the possibility you are in the wrong. Look for information on the subject from different sources.

ce54r Level 3 Nov 9, 2018
Reply

And where do you get the solid evidence? From those that did the study? Dig it up on your own, guess if you have the time and money.

1

If it is indeed "information", then work your way through the seven stages of grief about your past error to arrive at acceptance as quickly as possible.

John_Tyrrell Level 5 Nov 8, 2018
Reply
1

Research is definitely key. There's nothing wrong with admitting you were wrong, nor do we discontinue to keep learning.Too many people behave poorly and continue to live in ignorance

Kayterade5348 Level 4 Nov 7, 2018
Reply
1

I verify the info and make sure that it's coming from credible sources, has been peer reviewed, etc.

I'm unfortunately finding lately many people want to be considered a "freethinker" , but really they're just trying to legitimize truly untenable beliefs.

Umbral Level 8 Nov 6, 2018
Reply
1

I rarely come across information that goes against what I believe is true. I try not to attach belief to things that I am uninformed of and rarely will get into a discussion on a topic of which I am ignorant. If I'm presented information and data that does oppose what I think is accurate, then I verify the data that does go against what I thought I knew, and then have no choice other than to assimilate it into my understanding.

mattersauce Level 7 Nov 6, 2018
Reply
1

I don't mind admitting gaps in my knowledge, so am always looking for new information and evidence to either reinforce current ideas or to challenge and modify them.

RPardoe Level 6 Nov 6, 2018
Reply
1

Verify the evidence, accept it and consider yourself educated.

Byrdsfan Level 7 Nov 6, 2018
Reply
0

I've become more careful with this over the years.

First things first, I try and keep things I believe away from the things I know are true. It's just better that way, particularly when dealing with this type of inquisitor. Be that the theist or the conspiracy theorist.

Speaking of which . . .

While I don't know the wholesale trick to deal with such things (does anyone?), a couple of tricks I've learned are:

1.) Know your boundaries

2.) Don't start by explaining your side, to which they will almost certainly have a built-in system of rebuttles for

Mb_Man Level 5 Nov 11, 2018
Reply
0

The only appropriate response is that we integrate the new knowledge, and make changes to our working theory as appropriate. This is assuming it's irrefutable info. However... the level of proof which nears on irrefutable sets a mighty high bar. One could call that high bar a "bias"...or one could call it scientific. You can't prove or disprove something that is actually mumbo-jumbo. Unless it shows up and allows multiple sources to do some solid experimental work. I don't expect that to happen...But if the opportunity did present itself, and the experiments were all done, we'd have to change our outlook.

APaleBlueDot Level 5 Nov 11, 2018
Reply
0

When facts invalidate what you believe to be true, it is very difficult to acknowledge those facts. We have a predisposition, an emotional attachment, to our beliefs. But it is completely illogical, even detrimental, to our well being to hold on to beliefs in the face of facts. I tend to go with the facts and I have only loosely held "beliefs".

Seeker3CO Level 7 Nov 10, 2018
Reply
0

For years and years, I alwats believed that you only buttered on side of the bread when making a butty (sandwich), then my Mum told me that no, in fact both slices of bread are buttered, then you shove whatever you fancy in the middle. I listened to a more knowledgable person, I reviewed and critically analysed what I had formally 'known', I tried a new approach and by golly she was correct! Thats how we learn..

Amisja Level 7 Nov 6, 2018
Reply

Next step - try buttering BOTH sides of both slices. Then toss your sandwich in the frypan for a few minutes on each side.

0

Define confronted by info? If you mean someone presents a book or a research paper? I would check sources (both in detail and validity), look at the pro and cons for the issue at hand, and try to weigh the proposal against common sense. if they are just presenting their opinion, then I leave in the category of opinion until I can confirm it.

For example: There are hundreds of media outlets reporting that Russia hacked the DNC and then released the contents via Wikileaks. There are a few people reporting that Russia was not involved at all, but that a DNC insider released the emails because that person was upset that the Clinton, Brazille, and Wasserman-Schutlz rigged the primary against Bernie. If only fringe outlets with partisan platforms are presenting one angle on this, and if every intelligence agency is presenting a different one, I think I'm going to have to go with the one with less fringe. In the end though, asserting either as FACT is outside my scope as I can't confirm either without relying solely on the work and opinion of someone else.

Humanistheathen Level 7 Nov 6, 2018
Reply
0

I always consider ways for things that I think are true to be false.
I always consider ways for things that I think are false to be true.

Thus, when confronted with such information, I'm already well prepared for a response.

TheMiddleWay Level 8 Nov 6, 2018
Reply
0

I research the validity of such claims. The world comes up with discoveries every day.

Morphyon Level 5 Nov 6, 2018
Reply
0

that doesn't happen often because i am always examining and learning.

g

genessa Level 8 Nov 6, 2018
Reply
Write Comment
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content read full disclaimer
  • Agnostic.comis the largest non-profit community for atheists, agnostics, humanists, freethinkers, skeptics and others happy without religion!