I really have an issue with your statement that nuclear power is safe.

As a persons who got leukemia from (most l9ikely) X-rays, which I was told was "safe", I am nto so trusting of the arbitrary levels of what was set to be considered to be "safe". Any exposure to radiation has a risk.

Remember the aruguement from believers that says it is so unliely that the universe woudl be so finely tuned for life to exist as it does on earth, and the counter arguement is that life does exist, so a remote possibility is still possible? Well, exposure to small "safe" amounts of radiation having a effect on a person's health may be improbable, but it still is possible (as i foudn otu form personal experience).

When it comes to nuclear power, the storage of waste, is nto safe over the long term. It takes over 200,000 years to be considered "safe", but it still puts out snall amounts of radiation, which although improbable can still cause health issues.

That dons't een deal with natural diasters like what happened at Fukashima or Chernobyl. At Chenobyl mbody can live near it, and the plants and water around ti are still contaminated. Ruinning water carries the contamination to other areas.

Just that nuclear plants are expensive to decomission should make peopel wary. Because any corporation that has to spend money on cleanup for soemthign that will no longer produce profits, often cuts corners. Rdiation is something you can't EVER do half assed.

I was only mod3erately against nuclear power, but stil against it, until I was diagnosed with leukemia. Now I really question so called "safe levels" and wonder if things don't sometimes get fudged for higher profits and smoothed over with campaign contributions. I have become adamantly cynical about nuclear power beign safe.

I no longer consetn to casual E-ray use on my prwson, I wont' go through the new airport scanners that irradiate people to check for weapons, and I have even cut back on how often I fly in general, because you get exposed to more dasiation form outer space (mostly from teh sunh) at the higher elevations, as my oldest sister and her husband have been told by their doctors who actually knew they flew a great deal over their lifetimes, just from examination alone before asking.

It was really upsetting for me to see thsi video, wher I wondered how much of the increases in cancers are due to nuclear testighn releasign radiation the world and hwo much of it is as officials claim due to just peopel livign longer.

Thorium Molten salt reactors are interesting, too. Inherently safer, way more efficient as you can remove neutron absorbers before they 'poison' the reaction, very thermally efficient...
Too bad that molten sodium salts are so fucking corrosive.