This is a societal problem. Men still view woman as being “less than” and not having value beyond reproduction. Need more proof? The average guy judges a woman’s attractiveness based on the size of her mammary glands and waist/hip/butts. Can you imagine a world in which men were judged only on their height and the size of their biceps and penis?
Since woman aren’t that shallow, we look instead at personality and stability and dependability —- which, oftentimes, means looking at their job/career choices. Because of this, men assume women are most concerned about their income instead of understanding that they are just avoiding deadbeats.
It would be nice if men—in general—-made their mate choices based on the education, ambition, work ethic, and stability/dependability of a woman instead of her boobs.
Back on topic....this lawmaker is an asshat and this is just further proof that religion is at the root of most societal problems.
This guy proves himself wrong by simply saying that crap. With a single stoke he has alienated half the voters. His only saving grace is that (from what I gleen) the US electorate is thicker than two short planks and more dense than a black hole. (You elected a double bankrupt as president ffs).
As for "Just avoiding deadbeats" nice try. I can only assume that Jerry Hall must have found Rupert Murdoch to have a gsoh
@BeerAndWine Yeah but as I said before. YOU GUYS ARE DICKHEADS. You have been dickheads in the past with the cold war etc. And you continue to be with 45 Do I need to go on...? Knobheads with Knobhead senators. Well who put them in? mmm Your piers....... best of luck
I get lost when anyone ever says
All men
All women
All black people
All white people
All gay people.....
And so on. I think there is a name for that.
So much generalization which is horribly counterproductive. Not all men think the same. Your points about how women should be treated and how mates should be chosen were absolutely correct.