Agnostic.com

21 21

10 fallacies about atheists - have I missed any?

I'd say there are 10 very common atheism fallacies. - Have I missed any out?


  1. Atheist's can't prove there isn't a God so their belief is also faith based.

Well no one can coherently define what a God even is - just what a God does which is like saying frost exists therefore Jack Frost must be responsible for it. Anyone making a claim carries the burden of evidence NOT the skeptic.

  1. Atheists really KNOW God exists

Yeah yeah yeah & WE say theists know there ISN'T a god as well. - See how easy it is to make totally baseless claims?

  1. Atheists don't believe because they've had bad experiences with religion.

Well at least this one might be true but usually it isn't. 9 times out of 10 atheism is merely the default position of not believing a claim which has no verifiable evidence.

  1. Atheists can't know there isn't a God

True! We will all admit defeat as soon as theists prove they can know there are no mermaids either.

  1. Atheists just want to sin

If you don't believe in God you can't believe in sin either but you can believe in 'inappropriate behavior' (I avoid the word 'evil' because it often has connotations of a supernatural 'evil force' like the devil or demons).

  1. Atheists believe in nothing

No that's 'nihilism'. I suppose an atheist could also be a nihilist but I've yet to meet one. Most atheists I've met believe in verifiable propositions but even that isn't what atheism demands. It's a lack of ONE belief not a belief.

  1. Atheists are all solipsists

Solipsism is the attitude that only oneself exists because it's the only thing which can be known for sure. Well again I've never met a single atheist who believes this. There is some evidence that the 'outside world' exists so why bother imagining that it isn't real anyway? If you really didn't believe in anything but yourself you wouldn't eat or drink anything unreal. This is just silly.

  1. Atheists are all the same

Only in as much as they all lack one belief but apart from that they could be good or bad, nice or nasty, left wing or right wing, whatever. Being atheist is as significant as being left handed. I wouldn't even say all atheists are smart. Some aren't.

  1. There are no atheists in foxholes

i.e. Atheists don't remain atheist when the going gets tough & death is in sight. Well I guess it's possible some atheists may switch sides when the grim reaper draws near but I doubt this is often true. For instance outspoken atheist Christopher Hitchens went on tour while dying of cancer & used every dying breath to criticize religion. As soon as he died internet memes started flying around the internet claiming he converted on his deathbed but I actually predicted IN ADVANCE this would happen because it's such an obvious & easy lie to spread & the same lie was spread about Charles Darwin too once he's died. - What are the chances Richard Dawkins & Sam Harris will also be said to have done this once they're six foot under & also unable to deny such claims?

  1. Atheists who aren't 100% sure god is imaginary are actually agnostic.

The fallacy here is to confuse a lack of belief with a lack of knowledge which may seem very similar but in truth it's very different. For example I don't believe 'Nessie' claims (claims that the Loch Ness Monster exists.) But can I actually know that Nessie isn't somewhere in the deep ark depths of Loch Ness? Nope - but SO WHAT? Isn't a better question is 'Are there any good reason to believe Nessie exists?' - No. None really & it's irrelevant whether or not I can be 100% sure it isn't there because that's shifting the burden of evidence onto someone who never came up with the claim in the first place! But at least Nessie might be detected - most gods are said to be invisible, inaudible, intangible, odorless & generally unmeasurable... but hey, you can know Him in your heart (just like all the other gods claimed to exist.)

Paul 5 Nov 12
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

21 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

10

Hmm, you forgot one frequent one:

  1. Atheists have no morals

Which is obviously false, they just don't base their morals on arbitrary commandments, but rather on philosophical theories of ethics (or just their gut instinct, which is not always that good, to be fair, but a lot of religious people also rely on their gut instincts instead of their commandments, so it's all fair and game).

NB: Morals and ethics are, philosophically, exactly the same thing. It's just that one word comes from Latin and the other from Greek.

MarcO Level 5 Nov 22, 2017

So true! This is a very frequent comment.

Kind of the same thing, but I'm often told atheists have no foundation for morals. Obviously false for the reasons you give.

8

You have forgotten two important ones:
12 . Atheists eat babies,
13 . Atheist hold wild sex orgies,

Atheists don't have a monopoly on those things πŸ˜€

Can you point me in the direction of the wild sex orgies please? (Oh & I'm right out of babies - got any to spare HF?)

Oh I wish we held regular orgies, that would be great fun, but eating babies, No way because Atheists are NOT practising/pseudo-cannibals. Whereas the Xtian sacrament taking can easily and logically classed as being an act of Pseudo-Cannibalism. I.e. the drink the blood ( pseudo blood of course) and the body ( pseudo flesh of course) of the Idol whom they worship and claim blesses and empowers them after they have eaten it, exactly the same reasoning as to why real cannibals used to devour their captive enemies.

@Triphid , Oh, don't go all serious on us, babies don't possess any power they are just tasty.

@HeathenFarmer
Many Christains think atheist are worst than rapist.
Don't you rape your babies first to tender them up for good eating.?

When sex related sins are the greatest amount of sins. I can imagine Hell would be a hot nightclub.

Religion is working on cancelling hell, because it make them sound too sicko.

7

Excellent, the only one I can think of, that could be added is 'A lot of bad people in history were atheists (Hitler etc)'
or that atheists can't have any moral guidelines.

I think morality encompasses all beliefs and all humanity

Btw, Gothrik, IF you check the Historical FACTS re-Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Regime you will find that Hitler was a very devout Xtian and also that the Catholic Church signed a pact with the Nazis that remained in place throughout the entire Second World War. The R.C.C. also helped numerous High Nazi Officials escape from Europe and get into Argentina, etc, to avoid capture by the Allies.

6

Well articulated Paul. Further discussion about sin and what it is can be a rabbit hole, but it makes for stimulating conversation. If sinning is just anything detrimental to the greater good, then killing one person to save a thousand is okay? How about killing one to save two? Christians really lean hard on non-believers on this one, as their claim to moral absolutism is what they think makes them better than us.

So - like the abortion debate. Even though technically the world has the resources to support our population, certain microcosms are much better off thanks to the availability of the procedure. This was explained in Levitt & Dubner's book "Freakonomics".

So, sorry for the wandering thoughts... I think the one thing you missed that HeathenFarmer said was the baby eating thing. Made me lol.

5

1,2,10: People get caught up proving or disproving god instead of defining the word. The dictionary has a very good definition of it. 'a person or thing of supreme value'. I would go a step further in saying a 'God' is any person, place, object, concept or activity whether physical or non physical that an individual devotes an inordinate amount of time and dedication to. By this definition, we all have many gods. Whether or not there is a powerful man in the sky who does what he wishes with the cosmos is really not important at all, is it? He's gonna do whatever he wants.
3: Yup, usually we have bad experiences with people, not 'a religion', and i agree that anyone holding onto 'atheist' tends to be angry and unexamined about it
4: I'm still willing to believe mermaids exist, just like Nephilim, other dimensions and the inner earth, but i don't have proof and i wouldn't argue about anything other than possibility.
5: True, and funny. The word 'sin' is so often used to describe disobeying someone else's rules (incorrect, oppressive) when the truth is that it means to act against your own self interest.
6: Nihilism is actually impossible, you can't believe in nothing because you are, things are, you do things, you experience stuff, there is a truth. Also 'belief' is not like a piece of clothing you can take on and off, it's serious business, when you believe its because you really believe, not because you wish.
7: That's a cool word. I think the personal experience is all that can be proven to exist, which incorporates the inner and outer world.
8: RACIST! I mean... religionist... like is that a word? Lol.
9: Switching sides on your death bed is so lame. Remember that guy benny in the first Mummy movie with a symbol from each religion around his neck, begging each one to save him? Such cowardice.

---so i'm not sure if you were replying to someone else's list here, now that i've finished writing this, i just like talking about this stuff, i hope nothing was seemingly offensive πŸ˜€

I'm not so sure I can agree with what your's saying here JHeyoka. I'll explain why piecemeal.

"1,2,10: People get caught up proving or disproving god instead of defining the word. The dictionary has a very good definition of it. 'a person or thing of supreme value'"

What??! The world's largest diamond is of supreme value but it's hardly a 'god' is it? The fastest race horse is of supreme value but again it's not a god. One's child or spouse is generally of supreme value to us but neither are gods are they?

"I would go a step further in saying a 'God' is any person, place, object, concept or activity whether physical or non physical that an individual devotes an inordinate amount of time and dedication to."

No that's stretching the envelope WAY too far. People or things can certainly be said to be godlike metaphorically but a metaphor is always symbolic not literal.

"By this definition, we all have many gods."

By that definition yes but it's an inaccurate definition. There certainly are many god claims.

"Whether or not there is a powerful man in the sky who does what he wishes with the cosmos is really not important at all, is it?"

It would be if it were true. It would be of immense importance actually & this is what religious people believe which is why it's an issue because beliefs have consequences.

"He's gonna do whatever he wants."

Maybe but if he were real perhaps he can be persuaded to favor us if we ask him nicely enough! L.O.L!

"3: Yup, usually we have bad experiences with people, not 'a religion', and I agree that anyone holding onto 'atheist' tends to be angry and unexamined about it"

But I didn't say it was necessarily bad experiences with people. It's bad ideas i.e. Unsupportable claims about gods which no one has ever been able to justify which is the real problem.

"4: I'm still willing to believe mermaids exist, just like Nephilim, other dimensions and the inner earth, but I don't have proof and I wouldn't argue about anything other than possibility."

I don't believe you could actually tell yourself mermaids really might exist. In principle they might but in principle almost ANYTHING might but in practice if I told you there were actually mermaid do you seriously expect me to believe you could accept that claim as a serious proposition? Try it. Try believing mermaids exist & you will find that the harder you try the more you appreciate you're trying to kid yourself & this is precisely the dilemma atheist face when they try to believe something that rightly or wrongly they discover that they cannot.

5: True, and funny. The word 'sin' is so often used to describe disobeying someone else's rules (incorrect, oppressive) when the truth is that it means to act against your own self interest.

So we are in agreement here!

6: Nihilism is actually impossible, you can't believe in nothing because you are, things are, you do things, you experience stuff, there is a truth.

But nihilism isn't believing nothing exists, it''s having no values.

"Also 'belief' is not like a piece of clothing you can take on and off, it's serious business, when you believe its because you really believe, not because you wish."

Correct & this contradicts your claim that you could actually believe there are mermaids somewhere under the sea doesn't it?

7: That's a cool word. I think the personal experience is all that can be proven to exist, which incorporates the inner and outer world.

Again you've missed the point. It can't incorporate the outer world because solipsism is about only believing in your inner experiences but nothing about an outer reality.

8: RACIST! I mean... religionist... like is that a word? Lol.

I never used the word 'religionist' so I don't know why you are implying I did.

"9: Switching sides on your death bed is so lame. Remember that guy benny in the first Mummy movie with a symbol from each religion around his neck, begging each one to save him? Such cowardice."

I doubt it happens as often as theists claim it does if at all. - Why would it?

"---so I'm not sure if you were replying to someone else's list here, now that I've finished writing this, I just like talking about this stuff, I hope nothing was seemingly offensive"

No.

1,2,10 - When referencing "value" here, it is more on the 'of personal importance' definition, rather than the 'to be looked upon as somehow all powerful, of undeniable societal necessity, or as a wizard of some kind'. Perhaps 'Idol' would have suited your way of speaking better?

7: i was not attempting to redefine solipsism, since i have never heard the word, merely stating that i personally like the sentiment of it, as it alludes to my personal understanding that the personal experience is what can be proven, and that we must be respectful of other personal experiences

@JHeyoka thanks for your reply. I will comment on what you've said...

"1,2,10 - When referencing "value" here, it is more on the 'of personal importance' definition, rather than the 'to be looked upon as somehow all powerful, of undeniable societal necessity, or as a wizard of some kind'. Perhaps 'Idol' would have suited your way of speaking better?"

I;d say 'God-like' but being like something isn't the same as being something is it?

"7: I was not attempting to redefine solipsism, since I have never heard the word, merely stating that I personally like the sentiment of it, as it alludes to my personal understanding that the personal experience is what can be proven, and that we must be respectful of other personal experiences"

Some of them but many of them are highly toxic because people's personal experiences lead to beliefs & beliefs often sponsor inappropriate action don't they?

4

"most gods are said to be invisible, inaudible, intangible, odorless & generally unmeasurable" --- You forgot tastless. πŸ™‚πŸ™‚πŸ™‚

4

I believe that no matter which religion one believes in there must be some question in their minds that their religion brings up.This has often come up in discussions I have had with church goers . It usually is the first question i ask in any discussion on religion.and is often answered by the word faith. The interesting thing is that they often also believe that the science is true even when it conflicts with the beliefs of their religion. Normally, they do not have an answer for this fact.

4

I love the one about Just wanting to sin! If it's a sin and YOU enjoy it, It mIgHt noT be a Sin!

I agree with your view regarding sin. Sad to say I failed in one of our exams in law school concerning sin as a human right, LOL

4

They all seem pretty good to me, don't think I could fault any of them.

4

Edit: So if sin is moot, what are good terms for bad actions?

Inappropriate. Detrimental. The idea of secular humanism indicates that actions which are beneficial to human prosperity can be called "good". Actions that are detrimental will generally be considered "bad". So we can call them evil, but only by subjective human standards.

Yes I agree with everything JosephHarrison has said except "but only by subjective human standards." - Only? Suffering & happiness are intrinsically human experiences & we al know one is nice & the other isn't (do i need to say which is which?) This means they are both 'foundational' i.e. We can't really argue that they need further justification.

@JosephHarrison and @Paul: thanks for the rich vocabulary. I'm planning to go back to law school sometime next year.

Good and bad are judgments of value, they are relative and, as such, you can just use the term that works best with your own frame of reference. For a non-relative way to judge actions, you can try egoistical (which is done without taking other people into account) and altruistic (which is done while putting others' interest ahead of your own [except for Ayn Rand, but she loved to make up new definitions for every word of the dictionary]). I can't really think of other non-relative ways to judge actions at the moment.

Thanks for your reply @MarcO I will comment on each aspect:

"Good and bad are judgments of value,"

Yes, some thinks have positive value on general well being, other negative.

"they are relative and, as such, you can just use the term that works best with your own frame of reference."

'Just'? Well what if the frame of reference is general well being rather than simply yours?

"For a non-relative way to judge actions, you can try egoistical (which is done without taking other people into account) and altruistic (which is done while putting others' interest ahead of your own

Well this can be confusing because some 'self centered' actions actions are valid & not really 'selfish' as such - others can be 'all centered' (or 'you centered'πŸ˜‰ & also may not be appropriate to well being if it cost you too dearly. i.e. There's more to it than simple selfishness & altruism. It's more complicated than that.

"[except for Ayn Rand, but she loved to make up new definitions for every word of the dictionary])."

I wouldn't be surprised! It's what's called Humpty Dumpty syndrome - '"When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to meanβ€”neither more nor less." "The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make words mean so many different things."

"I can't really think of other non-relative ways to judge actions at the moment."

Just take a bigger view: Is there evidence this is OK if everyone acted the same way or would it end up harming in the bigger picture?

2

There is another one - that atheists are waging a deliberate and vindictive war on religious people.

Most atheist I know have no real problem with what people choose to believe - OK, we think they're dilusional and sometimes downright crazy, but heck, I'm a bit mad myself (in other ways).

What atheists object to is religion BEING USED AGAINST PEOPLE. Religious zealots using religion to justify bigotry and injustice. Religion 'judging' people who have every right to be, and act, as they choose as long as they hurt no-one. Religious people believing their faith should grant them rights and privileges that society as a whole believes they shoyld not have - a classic case being religious individuals who believe they shiuld have a 'right' to discriminate against homosexuals vecause of their faith.

When we have a US Congress that 99β„…Jewish/Christian and Trump 1000β„… behind Isreal, we have a major cluster fuck.

Richard Dawkins said Nationaism is more dangerous than Religion. Makes sense because the golden rule is who own the gold, make the rules. That would be the fake Jew Zionist.

My imagination is the most God-like feature That being the subconscious more powerful than the conscious mind. Follow up shortly with math facts and logic. Where as for the greedy bastard NWO think they own everything like corrupted Gods.

Solutions confront the synthetic fearing bankers and politican and lock them up long term. Model- Iceland bankruptcy turned around to become one of the happiest countries in the world.

2

You've gotten the well worn one Theists ( Faithfools) regularly cite everywhere, "Atheists are ALL Satan Worshippers."
My response to that statement every time is, "If we do NOT believe there is a God then WHY would we believe there is a Devil/Satan?"

2

Fallacies about your so called fallacies...

  1. It's not up to atheists to prove there isn't a god; it's logically impossible to prove something doesn't exist. There's no faith involved, we simply react to the fact that we have never seen anything that remotely indicates the existence of God. To the contrary, the onus is on the believer to prove God exists.

  2. This is really just paraphrasing of #1... doesn't count.

  3. Irrelevent. Pity those who suck on the drug of religion and waste their lives praying to Santa Claus for lack of a bad experience. Hope he brings you a lump of coal.

  4. Again, this is really just paraphrasing of #1... we're down to 8 delusions. Do you have mermaid nightmares? I have bad dreams about unicorns.

  5. Irrelevent. What do believers do when they're not sinning? The same thing atheists do when they're "inappropriately behaving". We all want to do it.

  6. I believe in the New England Patriots. I believe the sun will rise in the morning. Unlike the notion of God, I have plenty to base these "beliefs" on. The point being, belief is not synonymous with religion.

  7. Alright, this one is just plain dumb. I walked outdoors this morning and saw a bird, so I know for sure birds exist. Drove my car to work, so I know cars exists and that I have a job. Should I stop now?

  8. Another rerun; see #5.

  9. There are no religious in hell, either. Want to make a bet? For every atheist in a foxhole who converted to a believer, there are hundreds of thousands of believers who have become atheist under far less peril than a foxhole.

  10. God is only imaginary to the extent that someone else besides me wants to believe in him. So please don't speak for me. I don't sit here thinking he's imaginary, I simply don't see any evidence he exists. Like most anybody else on this site, I was conditioned as a child to accept the existence of God, and I think it's a credit to each our intelligences that we've been able to see through the fairy tales. As a child, you and I both eventually stopped believing in Santa Clause. As an adult, I have stopped believing in God. Please catch up already!

All the twisted logic you present is typical of the religious. In the end, it always comes down to the same thing: YOU CANNOT PROVE THE EXISTENCE OF GOD. And until you can, please spare us of all this silly nonsense. It's nothing but cheap spin.

godef Level 7 Nov 30, 2017

I don't quite get your point here @godef

"Fallacies about your so called fallacies..."

Isn't that shifting the burden of evidence? Remember is a response to a claim not a claim in & of itself.

"1) It's not up to atheists to prove there isn't a god; it's logically impossible to prove something doesn't exist."

Often yes - especially with god claims so your point is...? What?

"There's no faith involved, we simply react to the fact that we have never seen anything that remotely indicates the existence of God."

Yes so you point is...?

"To the contrary, the onus is on the believer to prove God exists."

Of course it is!

"2) This is really just paraphrasing of #1... doesn't count."

It's nothing of the sort!

"3) Irrelevent. Pity those who suck on the drug of religion and waste their lives praying to Santa Claus for lack of a bad experience. Hope he brings you a lump of coal."

so how is it a fallacy fallacy?

"4) Again, this is really just paraphrasing of #1... we're down to 8 delusions."

OK I'll give you that one - it's what atheists claim in so many ways!

"Do you have mermaid nightmares?"

No. Should I?

"I have bad dreams about unicorns."

Are they worse?

"5) Irrelevent. What do believers do when they're not sinning? The same thing atheists do when they're "inappropriately behaving". We all want to do it."

'It'??? There's no such thing as sin! It's a made up crime!

"6) I believe in the New England Patriots."

OK that's you.

"I believe the sun will rise in the morning."

I believe the earth will probably keep on spinning & the sun will come into view for about 12 hours myself. Nothing actually 'rises'.

"Unlike the notion of God, I have plenty to base these "beliefs" on."

No you don't the sun isn't moving in relation to us it's visa-versa.

"The point being, belief is not synonymous with religion."

So you can be genuinely religious but not believe a supernatural claim? Errr... how?

"7) Alright, this one is just plain dumb."

They're all dumb! That's the point I'm making!

"I walked outdoors this morning and saw a bird, so I know for sure birds exist."

Unless you're in the matrix!

"Drove my car to work, so I know cars exists and that I have a job."

Unless it was a dream!

"Should I stop now?"

No feel free to continue...

"Another rerun; see #5."

Because...? Can't you explain WHY it is?

"9) There are no religious in hell, either."

What hell? Allahs? Jehovah's? There are a lot to choose from!

"Want to make a bet?"

How would it be settled?

"For every atheist in a foxhole who converted to a believer, there are hundreds of thousands of believers who have become atheist under far less peril than a foxhole."

Do you have any data to support that claim?

"10) God is only imaginary to the extent that someone else besides me wants to believe in him."

So if I want to believe in Santa Claus he's kinda real somehow yeah?

"So please don't speak for me."

Did I say I was?

"I don't sit here thinking he's imaginary, I simply don't see any evidence he exists."

You know it's perfectly possible to be both agnostic AND atheist at the same time you know? Knowledge Is A Subset Of Belief. We act on what we believe therefore that's what really matters. There's a disjunction between 'I do not believe' & 'I do not know'.

"Like most anybody else on this site, I was conditioned as a child to accept the existence of God, and I think it's a credit to each our intelligences that we've been able to see through the fairy tales."

Yes. But it should be pretty obvious shouldn't it?

"As a child, you and I both eventually stopped believing in Santa Clause. As an adult, I have stopped believing in God. Please catch up already!"

Actually I never believed in God either but I did at least try!

"All the twisted logic you present is typical of the religious."

Indeed.

"In the end, it always comes down to the same thing: YOU CANNOT PROVE THE EXISTENCE OF GOD. And until you can, please spare us of all this silly nonsense. It's nothing but cheap spin."

Well I'm only agreeing it IS silly nonsense. What did you think I was saying then?

2

You've gotten pretty much everything. I can't think of any that you missed.

1
  1. Atheist punch puppies.

  2. Atheist are just lonely souls that need guidance.

1

β€œAtheists hate god.” Or that atheists worship/love Satan. We don’t hate god, we don’t believe one exists. It’s like saying that you hate leprechauns or the Easter bunny. No, I don’t hate god. Or leprechauns. Or the Easter Bunny. Or Satan. Because they are all imaginary.

1

Quick fact related to #5-Atheists make up less than 1% of the prison population in spite of the fact that they actually make up between 20 and 25% of the regular population.

Yes, atheist do less crimes and marriage rate are better and last longer.

Christians claim they live longer and have better paying job and lead the country. That could be called stacking the deck in their favor.

0
  1. agnostics and atheists have a lack of knowledge or belief of God. It isn't a statement that there is no God. If that is your position then you are in fact using faith.
  2. If I know God exists then Satan has done his job well by erasing any knowledge of God and who's fault is that? I didn't release Satan on the world.
  3. We are all born atheists it has nothing to do with having a bad experience it has to do with not having been indoctrinated or overcoming indoctrination.
  4. Nope we can't know there isn't a Big Foot either.
  5. Okay, and theists sin because?
  6. I believe in science. Is science nothing?
  7. solipsism? I believe in you so I'm not a solipsist.
  8. I'm human most of my atheists are human so we have at least two things in common.
  9. ummmm? I can't wait to see you demonstrate that?
  10. Knowledge vs Beliefs I'm both agnostic and an atheist.
0

On #9, there are no atheists in foxholes. To me that just shows that desparate situfations encourage irrational beliefs.

0

No 10
An atheist can not be 100percent sure God dose not exist.
The definition of an atheist is a lack of belief in God. Very much open to doubt, and doubt I would focus too much on.

The world is 99percent unknown and far greater the Universe. A 100percent sure God dose not exist would not make logical or good sense.

I'd say atheists CAN feel 100% sure a god does not exist. Most don't, I don't (I'm 99.9% sure just as I'm 99.9% sure there are no mermaids under the sea & that's as near as damn it isn't it?) But the issue of atheism is nothing at all to do with feeling sure. It's only about one thing: Belief & no atheists believe god claims. Talking about claims to knowledge as far as atheists are concerned is missing the mark just as it would be if there was such a thing as 'amermaidists' who are told they cannot be 100% certain there are none under the sea somewhere because only 1% (or whatever) of the ocean's content is known.

In a world where the vast majority of people who say there are mermaids down there somewhere (or a God up there somewhere) it's for the believers to justify their claims not for the unbelievers who don't buy it regardless of whether they feel 100% sure such claims are unfounded or just 50%. - Or would you take exception to me saying I know there are no mermaids under the sea when I'm told this isn't the case?

When facts are not clear, math dose not lie

When the earth's 1 percent mass surface is 6km deep. When humans only collectively know less then 1percent about this earth mass. How anyone claim to know physically untouched 99 percent unknown mass. My imagination guess there is no mermaids, fairies, big or Aliens on the earth. Answers are better understood somewhere between extreme atheist and the Religious.

@Castlepaloma 'When facts are not clear, math dose not lie'

No it doesn't but how does that suggest a god might exist?

'When the earth's 1 percent mass surface is 6km deep.'

OK.

'When humans only collectively know less then 1percent about this earth mass. How anyone claim to know physically untouched 99 percent unknown mass.'

Can't we make a relatively accurate educated guess from what we DO know?

'My imagination guess there is no mermaids, fairies, big or Aliens on the earth.'

Exactly.

'Answers are better understood somewhere between extreme atheist and the Religious'

Why take any notice of supernatural claims at all though? I can't see how it even a coherent concept on closer inspection. What do you think it could mean?

@Castlepaloma 'When facts are not clear, math dose not lie'

No it doesn't but how does that suggest a god might exist?

'When the earth's 1 percent mass surface is 6km deep.'

OK.

'When humans only collectively know less then 1percent about this earth mass. How anyone claim to know physically untouched 99 percent unknown mass.'

Can't we make a relatively accurate educated guess from what we DO know?

'My imagination guess there is no mermaids, fairies, big or Aliens on the earth.'

Exactly.

'Answers are better understood somewhere between extreme atheist and the Religious'

Why take any notice of supernatural claims at all though? I can't see how it even a coherent concept on closer inspection. What do you think it could mean?

0

HULK smash

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:3628
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.