Agnostic.com

8 3

LINK Split Brain Patient - Both Atheist & Christian! - YouTube

These strange clinical cases raise some serious questions about the existence of the soul.

holykoolaid 6 Aug 2
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

8 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Maybe in time half of him can be saved. The question is "saved from what?"

0

fascinating

0

Interesting!

0

Fantastic! Please tead my full bio. @holykoolaid

1

meh, I'm not convinced. I still see a seer. There's a viewer to cause the objectivity and vendatics completely undermine every split brain scenario this guy wants to propose because he doesn't consider a singular consciousness rendered thru the physical filter.

Quite honestly it's hard to take a lot of this guy's criticism seriously since he doesn't understand the positions on the other side - especially vedantics. It's awfully hard to completely dismiss things you don't understand also.

Perfect Jeff! Great response.

@WilliamFleming thanks. I don't want to leave the impression that I think dasana are unassailable - but you have to actually understand them in order to refute them. It's obvious from his continued tirade against the physical that he understands neither mimamsa nor vedanta and his complaints all focus on an aspect of hinduism that no longer even exists. Unlike Abrahamic views modern Hinduism actually changes with evolutions of culture and science. Listen to the Dalai Lama - he's a man of science. The few modern Jains are the same. The astika philosophies are the same way overall even if some local cultures do still embrace aspects of bhakti. Atheists and many in the west get hung up on the existence of gods within the hindu gamut of beliefs without realizing the HUGE difference between abrahamics and hindus in that aspect. Hindu gods are models of conduct and personifications of traits they wish to emulate ... NOT mystical beings set on high in judgment.

1

We have more than enough evidence demonstrating that the brain is what allows us to do what we do, think what we think and act as we act, but nobody wants to accept that the brain and therefore the mind is the result of physics, and subject to all the rules and laws of our reality.

We cling to the notion of a soul, the existence of concepts like free will, and human exceptionalism, but at the end of the day these things have neither truth nor are they pragmatic for anyone except the weak minded. In time, those who reject these concepts will come to dominate those who do not.

Robotic people have attempted to dominate many times but their regimes always come to naught.

@WilliamFleming Those people in the past didn't have access to the tools and resources that may be available to those in the near future. Already governments and large corporations collect invaluable data on nearly everyone, most of which is offered up to them for free, or perhaps more accurately exchanged for their free services. As tools utilizing machine learning and deep neural networks become more prevalent, information about people that they may not even be consciously aware of will be used against them in ways that the users may be unable to fully understand.

Imagine a system that knows everything about you, what you do and don't like, where and how you live, and other more subtle things such as how you will react to certain stimuli, your nervous quirks or your facial expressions. Such a system could be used to convince you, not through overt manipulation or coercion, but through genuine influence to do what it wants you to do, or what it's users want you to do.

If you believe in free will, then all the actions you are taking are fully yours and just happen to disproportionately benefit some other party. If you do not believe in free will, then you will be able to recognize this is happening, and although no actions will be able to free you from it, you can take steps to level the playing field so to speak.

@Happy_Killbot Wouldn’t taking those actions be a demonstration of free will?

@WilliamFleming No, because if the world is deterministic or stochastic in nature they would have done those same things anyways, including you choosing to not do the systems biding. We still can't rule out that free will exists, but if we can effectively manipulate anyone as if they were a machine, then for all intents and purposes they do not.

Lets put this a different way. For the sake of argument, lets assume that every tangible object is both sentient and capable of free will. If you pick up an object and turn it in your hand, you can not prove that it didn't turn simply because it wanted to. Therefore, the fact that it moves as you want it to would be irrelevant because it is choosing to do what it wants, and that desire just happens to coincide with your own. You can never prove that every object doesn't have free will, but for all pragmatic purposes they do not.

0

All those silly questions about souls, the afterlife, heaven and hell, they represent a continuous and boring campaign against traditional religious dogma. For me anyway they are beating a dead horse—it can easily be proven that traditional religious dogma makes no sense. Those who cling to that dogma are not going to listen to any argument.

What is demonstrated by the video IMO is that the sense of self as a body is an illusion and that there’s a lot more to our reality than it appears.

1

they're doing some amazing research on the 2 different brains. some studies have been done with ppl that have had the cord connecting the 2 brains severed & have shown that the 2 sides of the brain might have totally different personalities. so 2 ppl could inhabit the same body.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:382956
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.