I read thru this article , as I was able to , but I could not make the connection they were implying ‍
I really do not like using the stuff , but I do not want to have to forgo my self isolation , & mow grass every 7~10 days either ‍
My upper lungs are damaged from heavy smoking from 30 years ago. I am clean now , but the resolve of my vices from a younger life are still a factor .
Are they drawing any real conclusions ?

Sounds like pseudo science

Must be blocked ?

Too rambling and tenuous. The author is struggling to link anything to Glyphosate to support this hypothesis. Unfortunately, it doesn't make logic.
For instance, why doesn't Almeria have more deaths? Why does Germany, with so many infections, have so few deaths, yet uses a lot of bio-fuel?
Maybe the dots need numbers on them.

The existence of glyphosate is one important reason why organic foods are considered safer. Though continuous proximity to glyphosate in various types of pollution may be more deadly.