Has the threat of eternal damnation ever worked on atheist/agnostic because this is in my opinion the most recurring argument I hear
Well, first, that point is moot because atheists don't believe in the existence of Hell and, second, you can ask them if a religion based on fear is worth following, even if it was right. I'd say "screw you" to any deity which would punish people just for not believing in it, even if it lead me to eternal damnation; such a deity would not deserve our worship, even if it existed.
Not all religions believe in a heaven or hell. You could point that out to them and ask why they think their religion is the one true one.
You could ask them to give you a detailed definition of their god.
You could ask them to show you testable, falsifiable evidence for the existence of this god.
When they can't do any of this (and they won't) you can easily tell them that the conversation is no longer worth having.
Or how about the ancient Olympians? They predate the monotheistic Christian religion several centuries . Are these believers condemned to hell for simply being at the wrong time period?
Or is everyone after them condemned to Hades? Because a religion doesn't have many believers anymore doesn't change anything about its odds of being right
What makes a religion true to the individual person depends on where they were born, the predominant religion in that region, and the beliefs or their parents.
That threat is only about fear mongering. It is a cowards way to deal with life. So ask these people if they think cowardliness is a prerogative for heaven? .
I think the Willy Wonka Chocolate Factory story is a good example.
Good point. Basically they are saying they only believe out of fear and not loyalty