Flaming!

He's encouraged the Orange Blister to fight hard in the court

Misogynistic bigot.....

Yes. These weak, pathetic men don't possess the qualities that a self respecting educated, intelligent, evolved woman would give the time of day to, so they need to find weak pathetic women they can control or live a very lonely life.

It might happen.

I miss u

@Pralina1 Miss you, too.

He can drop dead of cancer.

Poetic. And on point. Well said.

@Anonamoose Thank you.

@KKGator I haven't followed Carolina politics but it doesn't say a lot for Carolina voters when he gets reelected.

@Anonamoose No, it does not.
I'm hopeful we'll be able to turn the Senate blue, in the Georgia runoffs in January.
However, I won't be surprised if the republicans manage to win.
Unfortunately, some old habits die really hard here in the South.

South Carolina is dominated by......guess who? Evangelicals, religious whackjobs.

@SeaRay215ex...and I know this because one of them (from South Carolina) live close to me. She's been in South Africa for 7 yrs now.

I think you are watching to much RT. You and Scott Atlas can wallow in the lies and Russian propaganda it Spews out every day.
You need to do some reading and research into how Russia has treated the Ukraine from Stalin to Putin. When you learn about the Purges in the Ukraine done by Stalin and the forced Famine done to the Ukraine after world war 2, maybe then we can take your opinions as ones that are informed at least.

I agree with most of what you say about Vietnam, but when you start calling people "fucking scared-ass old ladies" you lose my respect. Name calling is a Trump Trade mark. He would be so proud of You.

@dermot235 And you get this information about Ukraine, Stalin, and Putin from where? What is your source?

You think the USA is some great savior of the world?

@Archeus_Lore So you think Stalin treated the people of the Ukraine well. If you listen to what Kruschev (The Russian Premier) said about stalin you would understand. Do you think the forced Famine in the Ukraine after WW2 is a myth. Do you think that the Purges in the 30's in the Ukraine are a myth. You need to go read some history books and educate yourself.

I think that a lot of people make the mistake of seeing all issues as one-sided, they read the American media and watch the American news and think they know what is happening in other parts of the world based on that. Most Americans never bother to seriously learn another language and read stories from other countries and as a result never realize just how much they have been lied to. In fact, the USA does not even hide it any more, but people are still so dense and parochailly-minded that they can't see it when it is right in front of them.

Since World War II, the USA has killed more than 20 million people, that averages out to roughly 282,000 per year, 23,474 per month, or 782 per day. The USA has been at war more than 90% of the time since 1776! The USA:
.
interfered in Iraq - there is a war there now.
interfered in Syria - there is a war there now.
interfered in Libya - there is a war there now.
interfered in Yemen - there is a war there now.
interfered in Ukraine - there is a war there now.
interfered in Afghanistan - there is a war there now.
.
No pattern of behavior here at all, right?

When are Americans going to start worrying about putting their OWN house in order before bitching about other countries when they do not speak that countries native language, understand its culture, and can't even understand what is going on in their OWN country, let alone some other country?

@Archeus_Lore You have an obvious inability to see any wrong in Russian behaviour. I can condemn the invasion of Iraq by the US. I can condemn Reagans foreign policy in Latin America. Are you capable of condemning ANYTHING Russia does. Your list of countries interfered with is very telling considering it was Russia that invaded Afghanistan before the US did. And it was Russia that interfered in Syria, the Ukraine. And it was Russia that interfered in Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Finland (they invaded Finland in Peace time), The Baltic states, have you ever heard of the Iron Curtain. Stalin killed more that 30 million of his own people in the Purges. So if you are going to make a case against American foreign policy, try bring some balance in to the conversation. At the moment you just sound like a mouth piece for Putin.

You seem to have it in for Russia, huh? Sorry to burst your bubble, but BEFORE Russia did what it did in Ukraine, as shown in the video I posted, Lindsey Graham and John McCain were there encouraging chaos. And, Obama admitting his role in the US-supported coup in Ukraine, a war crime. (First video link below).
Victoria Nuland, Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs at the United States Department of State, admits in the second video that the USA supported the Ukrainian coup with 5 billion dollars. Note the Chevron symbol in the background of the video. John McCain (Senator Lovewar himself) and Victoria Nuland were in Ukraine in December 2013 amid the mass anti-government protests. (The third video is of John McCain in Ukraine addressing protesters.) During the visit, McCain met with Ukrainian opposition leaders in the country’s capital of Kiev, voicing his support for the protests, adding that he saw Ukraine’s future with Europe.
Biden's youngest son, Hunter Biden was hired to the board of Burisma Holdings, Ukraine’s largest private gas producer.
The proxy Ukraine war is all about energy. The Eastern part of Ukraine is the major oil and gas producing region of Ukraine accounting for approximately 90 per cent of Ukrainian production and according to EIA (The American Energy Information Administration) may have 42 tcf (trillion cubic feet) of shale gas resources technically recoverable from 197 tcf of risked shale gas in place.
George Soros is heavily invested in Ukraine . . . . to the tune of about one billion dollars.
Obama admits the US-sponsored coup:

So there is more evidence that the USA has been causing problems, not to mention . . . . NATO's Eastward Expansion: Did the West Break Its Promise to Moscow?
What the US secretary of state said on Feb. 9, 1990 in the magnificent St. Catherine's Hall at the Kremlin is beyond dispute. There would be, in Baker's words, "no extension of NATO's jurisdiction for forces of NATO one inch to the east," provided the Soviets agreed to the NATO membership of a unified Germany. Moscow would think about it, Gorbachev said, but added: "any extension of the zone of NATO is unacceptable."
[spiegel.de]

So you can complain all you want about Russia, but it is not Russia that has surrounded the USA with military bases, it is the USA that has surrounded Russia with military bases, and, just because I point out all the stupid shit the USA does does not mean that I think Russian political leaders in the past have been blameless, but since the end of WWII, the USA has been spoiling for a fight with Russia or China, and eventually they will get it. Unlike you though, I do not go out of my way to pretend I know what leaders did what in the USSR, because for one thing, what happened 50 years ago is far less relevant than what is happening now, and, I do not pretend to know shit that I have not spent time researching in the language of the country concerned, rather than listening to some bull shit stories put together by the CIA and the military industrial complex that has lied to the American people repeatedly, so much so that they have a long standing record of doing so.

Since you are so interested in digging up dirt on other countries, how many people from those other countries have you actually talked to?

Unless you are a Child locked in a Cage kept from your parents. Pretty restrictive I would say.

It is a common mistake to confuse leftism with liberalism. Most centrist Republicans are classical liberals.

@PBuck0145 I guess it depends on how far back you're going when you say "classical". "Classical" liberalism is New Deal- Great Society liberalism; social programs for the poor and a Social Security-Medicare-Medicaid safety net. By that definition, the center of the Republican party has been shrinking since the '80s. The official party doctrine (or maybe just the effective party doctrine) has been to find a way to shrink the safety net and disqualify as many people as possible.

If you meant to say "libertarians", then yeah, many are. In which case their interests are more closely aligned with the Democratic party, except that they disagree on tax policy and social programs generally. But on social issues, the Democrats are actually more libertarian. As Reagan said, "Do whatever you want, as long as you don't do it in the street and scare the horses." Most Dems would agree with that.