Exactly!

@Hages like nobody here knows this, Sherlock.

Proof not available? More crap posted by wishy washy "new theists." Just do some basic research on google for tons of the shit you say is not available. I call bullshit.

I assume you mean evolution is not proof for or against the existence of god. I agree with that.

@Mofo1953 There's plenty of evidence tending toward things such as reincarnation, for instance, or psychism, but that's not 'proof' of that or 'god' or anything else. But if we change our definitions, it might be, and if we don't, then what is the source of these phenomena? It's possible to give these things credence without ascribing them to a creator, regardless.
Is that 'wishy washy,' or just the kind of question an agnostic might ask, and to which an atheist reacts violently?
Another 'proof' there's a BIG difference between the two schools of thought, and another reason I wish some people would stop trying to equate the two as simply differences on some kind of scale between theists and atheists. Agnosticism belongs in it's own separate category, in my opinion.

@nicestuff Exactly. NOTHING short of a divine visitation is a proof of the existence of 'god.' ANY 'supernatural' phenomenon can be attributed to a purely physical source, just perhaps one we simply don't yet understand.
(Even a 'divine visitation' might really be one by an extraterrestial alien, for that matter.)

@Storm1752 post just one piece of your so called plenty evidence. I don't see any violent reaction from non believers anywhere, so much for your proofs of nothing really. Your opinion is just that and nothing more than your opinion. There's nothing to change because there is certainly a big difference between not believing in made up things and not being sure that made up things are or are not made up. Which is the true definition of a wishy washy belief system.

@Mofo1953 YOURS is a violent reaction.
You can Google the extensive studies done at the University of Virginia by Dr. Ian Stevenson, Dr. Jim Tucker, and others.
Psychism? Edgar Cayce is one psychic studied exhaustively.
Crop Circles: despite the debunking, many cannot be easily dismissed as two men with a rake, board, and plywood.
There are many other examples of unexplained phenomena.
These are not 'proofs' of the existence of 'god,' but they are SOMETHING. To reflexively dismiss all of it as "crap" constitutes a violent reaction, especially when such dismissals are accompanied by crude, rude, sarcastic (etc.) ad hominem attacks. In my opinion.

@Storm1752 your opinion is meaningless.

@Mofo1953 I disagree.

@Storm1752 figures.

It gets mixed in all the time with it.

It is.