Agnostic.com

5 6

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

5 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Problem is, accepting something today because it was once prevalent in the past is a weak argument. Would one condemn someone who supported a lower population because they had a large family? Or how about supporting someone's racist ideology because their ancestors had slaves? Things and times change and often what was valid in the past is no longer valid today.

1

THIS!!! It was purrrrrrrrrfect!

2

Republicans want to have everything both ways. They are for something one day and against it the next depending on who their audience is.

Vindman is truly an American hero and I hope that becomes more and more obvious soon.

1

Isn't this the same guy Trump wanted to fire because his ancestors were immigrants from the Ukraine

probably but Col. Vindman was one of the people who testified about the facts concerning trumps quid pro quo phone call to Ukraine.

@silverotter11 both hand his brother lost their job over that testimony.

@Lorajay That was at the top of the list of the most disgusting things trump has done and it's a long list.

1

Schooled

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:620783
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.