Gotta say I disagree with all of that but I'll address these points:
1: Daniel has been a great Bond because he plays the role with a seriousness the character's life would demand. Sean understood this, also, but Broccoli didn't. He loved Moore. Apparently the kids don't get what Bond represents, either, despite Craig's brilliant performances and looks. In CR there's a scene, in M's home, when Craig's profile looks like Connery that I want to believe was intentional. I'm also of the opinion that Fleming should have killed Bond, as he wanted to do but couldn't bring himself to actually do, so I'm okay with letting him go. I do agree that the action scenes are too much. That is not Craig's fault, however, so I don't hold his performance to those.
2: We discuss the male aspect of Bond so invent a new character. She can't say "My name is Bond. James Bond (or whatever they change it to)" without being laughed out of existence.
3: Ian Fleming cared so I should think we should. Fleming would still care because it kind of feminizes him (since Bond=Fleming).
4: We do that every time Bond changes faces but not in this manner. This manner is just...no.
5: No. Once the Genie is dead the bottle is worthless trash.

@rainmanjr

1. I have no issue with Craig as Bond only how the character is written and the stories presented. The Craig movies are joyless, somber, gritty, and no fun to watch in my opinion. If that's what you're looking for in a movie then that's fine with me.
2. The new 007 is a new character. Her names isn't James Bond. She is the new 007 just like they've had new Q's and M's over the years.
3. Ian Fleming is dead. So is Albert Broccoli. Their ideas were fine for decades but we live in a new era. If the Bond franchise wants to appeal to a new and younger audience it has to change.
4. Many aspects of Bond haven't changed. Also... he should be 90 years old. A new 007 realistically makes sense.
5. Not true. Franchises get refurbished and rebooted all the time such as Tarzan, King Kong, Spiderman, Batman, Superman, Godzilla, Peter Pan, etc.

What's getting stretched? LMAO

Yeah. That would be fine. Bond was, essentially, Ian Fleming so this is kind of making Fleming a transgendered person. I think Ian would have objected.

We need to remake Cinderella and snow white with an all men cast! That'll show em lol

I don't disagree with that POV. At some level the fans matter and, I think, fans of Bond respond to his maleness. That's important to the character (I think it's the reason the character transcends actors) butt the Broccoli's obviously disagree with my POV. I'd prefer of them to simply kill James Bond and start a new franchise. Maybe Bond's daughter (who was recruited by M) but not a complete take-over of his skin. What's the pronoun? He/her/they? I'll simply let go of the character.

@Tejas Hey, there was an all-gay male ballet production of Swan Lake. But I assume the addition of "gay" automatically changes the category to something slightly other than merely a male production.

@MikeInBatonRouge Yeah. This would be more of rewriting the tale so that it's not just men playing women's parts.

Apparently, that's what it's all about.