Agnostic.com

1 1

So protesters in NZ are accused of using "intimidation and harassment"
WTF do these "5 eyes" mungbean leaders think the protests are about? Something about how the mandates and accompanying coercion to comply equates intimidation and harassment me thinks.
[abc.net.au]
If they want things to "return to normal", all they have to do is comply............I'm sure they have heard that one before. One difference being, protesters won't move the goalposts

puff 8 Feb 14
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

1 comment

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Enforcing the rule of law is not the equivalent of intimidation and harassment and legitimate protests do not involve intimidation and harrassment anyway.

Like the BLM ones?

@puff Be sure to present credible evidence to support any factual allegations.

@LovinLarge

@puff Your undated video fails to indicate any group affiliation or even what issue was being demonstrated. Were you aware that Pittsburgh is not in NZ?

@LovinLarge Guessing around Sept 8th 2020, when uploaded to youtube. Considering the beer guzzler's T-Shirt, protests to do with BLM and police violence.

@puff Uploading to YouTube is not definitive of age. You can't extrapolate a single tshirt to the larger group. Your video is not credible evidence of BLM protestor intimidation and harrassment. Your attempt to equate BLM protests with the intimidation and harrassment by NZ antivax protestors fails.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:650606
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.