Agnostic.com

7 11

LINK Nearly half of Gen Z, born after 1996, has no religious affiliation whatsoever

New data from the Cooperative Election Study reveals startling facts about the least religious generation ever

The youngest Americans are the least likely churchgoers we’ve ever seen, according to new data from the Cooperative Election Study and analyzed by sociologist Ryan P. Burge.

Not only have the shares of non-religious people gone up within each generation, the bars are simply higher for each younger generation.

(Follow link to view graphs referred to in article)

That graph shows how nearly half of Gen Z (born after 1996) has no religious affiliation whatsoever. It’s an astonishing change that shows how the grip of faith has loosened over time and how organized religion itself is no longer seen as useful for young people whose lives have been upended by conservative beliefs and the loudest voices inside those denominations.

What’s fascinating about those numbers is how, even though there isn’t a huge change when you look at each generation’s snapshots in 2016, 2020, and 2022, Gen Z keeps getting less religious. They began high (non-religious) and yet the numbers are still going up. As others appear to be leveling off, there’s no telling how much higher the Gen Z non-religious numbers will get.

Says Burge:

It seems statistically justifiable to say that by the time the United States has another presidential election, half of Generation Z will identify as atheist, agnostic, or nothing in particular.  

Whether politicians will recognize that and actively try to earn those votes remains to be seen. They’re so used to pandering to people of faith that even Democrats may not realize how much people are longing to hear candidates say their policies will never be dictated by the religious beliefs of certain powerful groups.

Just look at the breakdown of religious labels for Gen Z:

While Protestant and Catholic still have significant numbers, they amount to about a third of the entire group. The combination of “Nothing in particular,” agnostic, atheist, and even “something else” dominate the rest of the chart. This is a generation that doesn’t see faith as synonymous with virtue.

To that point, Burge notes that 38% of Gen Z never attends religious services, while 70% of them attend once a year at most. Millennials (both 1977-1995) have similar numbers. Given that 39% of the Silent Generation attends church weekly or more often, it’s a complete shift in values—or at least how we perceive religious services as indicative of those values.

At a time when churches are trying to pass the torch to a new generation of leaders, there are fewer options than even, and even then, those younger leaders will have a harder time trying to bring new people into the fold.

So why is all this happening? The survey doesn’t get into that, but it’s not hard to speculate on the reasons.

Many powerful churches—certainly the ones that get mainstream attention—are political in all the wrong ways. They’re anti-LGBTQ, anti-abortion, and anti-vaccine. They don’t want women preaching in church and they won’t acknowledge the existence of trans people. They spread lies about sex, work to ban books, oppose racial justice, downplay our climate emergency, demonize public schools, celebrate assault weapons, and endorse right-wing candidates who live out none of their supposed values. Even when confronted with the harm they’re causing, they use their faith as a shield as if that makes them immune to criticism.

Not every church is like this, but non-denominational evangelical megachurches, the Southern Baptist Convention, the Mormon Church, and the Catholic Church all stand behind many of those ideas. Pastors within those groups who disagree often feel powerless to push back.

That means on the most pressing cultural issues of our time, religious organizations have often taken the more thoughtless, more cruel, and least scientific paths imaginable. They have made our country a less safe place to live. They have repeatedly shown that they cannot be trusted on matters of basic human decency. There’s no shortage of articles documenting their hypocrisy.

There are undoubtedly religious leaders who oppose all of this and don’t hold back in their criticism. Church/state separation groups even work with them on legal cases! But at the end of the day, they still believe the truth lies in the same works of fiction as their religious colleagues. Not exactly an appealing pitch to a generation of people who have been inundated with lies every time they go online.

That said, the problem with people leaving organized religion is that they’re not necessarily replacing it with anything else. We’re not changing what our communities look like and believe; we’re just losing communities, period. As much as I’d like to think people who leave church are becoming more politically or socially active, we’re often just choosing isolation and nebulous online communities which don’t have the same benefits.

I’m just speculating, of course. The good news is that we’re rapidly moving away from organized religion. After decades of watching conservatives use their religion as a weapon to harm the most vulnerable people in our society, many young people have decided to ditch faith altogether. Whatever they replace it with can’t possibly be worse than what they’re walking away from.

snytiger6 9 Apr 7
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

7 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

It's good that the younger generation have are more enlightened than there parents. It's great they left religion or never been do the reasons above are great. Another possible reason is that religion takes to much effort. SInce, some of younger generation is lazier than the previous.

4

Nearly half.

What a shame. Not 'over half' or 'nearly all'.

3

People of this generation you speak of are busy textng each other while in the same room. The only thing they have that is organized is their phone.

snytiger6 9 replied Apr 8, 2023 0

Your post summoned up a picture in my mind of kids in church texting each other instead of listening to sermons. That thought made me smile.

2

Hopefully the start of the end of those christofascistsmaga death cult members!!!

4

Fewer future Bible belt Republicans.

2

By Bill Mahar stats graf shows each generation the religious Christian have been in great decline. Wail each LGBT has increased each generation. BY 2050 we may be all gay.

Hooray. Gaiety is far better than sadness.

Your post kinda reminded me of a Bob Newhart episode, where Howard Hessmand plays a character that comes out as gay. For the mid 1970's it was ground breaking. The scene starts at about the 9:40 mark.

More people identifying as gay could just be that there isn't the same stigma of nontraditional sexual orientations or sexual identities as there way when I was in high school in th elate 1970's. People are more willing to be honest about who they are, rather than hiding their individuality in shane.

On the other hand there are studies which also show that the older the parents are when they have kids, the more likely it is that their kids will be gay. As people are generally waiting longer to have children, it has resulted in more gay children beign born.

There is also a study which came out of the old USSR, which showed that mothers who experience higher levels of stress in the second trimester of pregnancy were more likely to have gay children. At the time it wasn't understood why. However later studies showed that "gay genes" are mostly meta genetic, meaning they are like switches which can be flipped while the child develops in the womb, and the meta genetic switch can get flipped depending on environmental conditions experienced by the mother during pregnancy. It is theorized that way back in our evolution, like when our biological ancestry was like a rodent that mated several times a year, when food became scarce, causing stress, it was advantageous to produce homosexual offspring which would not reproduce and reduce food supplies even more, as a theory as to how the gay meta genetic genes may have been a beneficial evolutionary trait.

So, with higher levels of stress in our society, parents waiting longer to have kids, and there being less stigma to identifying as LGBT+, it may seems like more people are turning gay, but actual numbers probably are not changing as much as it seems. It is just all happening at once.

2

Hallelujah, praise the lord!!!🙏🏼

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:718168
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.