Agnostic.com

5 2

LINK When it comes to accepting climate change, white evangelicals lag far behind -- Friendly Atheist

A new PRRI survey finds that only 8% of white evangelicals believe climate change is a serious problem

When it comes to the climate crisis, non-religious Americans recognize the existential threat for what it is while white evangelical Christians remain lagging far, far behind, according to a new survey from PRRI.

Just consider the percentage of people who believe climate change is a crisis (which it is) and how those numbers have changed over the past decade for various groups.

(Follow article link to view photos/PDFs that accompany article.)

In 2014, 33% of religiously unaffiliated Americans accepted that we were facing a climate crisis. That number has now jumped to 43%. Still too low, to be sure, but higher than any other “religious” group in the nation.

While PRRI didn’t give numbers for atheists specifically, a Pew Research Center survey from 2022 found that 88% of atheists accepted that global climate change was a serious problem.

White evangelicals, on the other hand, are heading backwards when they barely had any room left, going from a scant 13% in 2014 to a pathetic 8% today. (The Pew survey did not separate evangelicals from white evangelicals, hence the disparity.)

The only groups that accept the crisis more than the average American are the Nones, Jews, and Hispanic Catholics.

If there’s any consolation here, it’s that there’s been a drop in the percentage of Americans who believe religion is important in their lives. To quote Mark Silk at Religion News Service, “while white evangelicals have become less willing to consider climate change a crisis, there are significantly fewer of them.” So at least we have that going for us.

The problem, of course, is that the ever-shrinking number of conservative Christians still have outsized authority in our politics. The Republican Party is full of right-wing Jesus lovers who ignore or downplay the threat of the crisis.

Their spiritual leaders are no better.

In 2007, the Southern Baptist Convention followed suit with a resolution that was skeptical about evidence for anthropogenic climate change and opposed to anything that interfered with economic development.

Individuals with large Christian audiences aren’t helping either. Preacher John MacArthur, who was one of many pastors to simply brush aside the COVID threat, said in 2008 that no one needed to worry about the climate because God intended for us to treat it like a used Kleenex:

God intended us to use this planet to fill this planet for the benefit of man. Never was intended to be a permanent planet. It is a disposable planet. Christians ought to know that.

Right wing activist Mary Colbert has said climate change is Satan’s way of distracting us from realizing the consequences of our sins. God was sending tornadoes and storms to punish us, but Satan wanted you to think climate change was responsible.

Creationist Ken Ham says the only kind of climate change we need to worry about is going to Hell.

Abusive pastor Mark Driscoll once said at a Christian conference, “I know who made the environment and He’s coming back and going to burn it all up. So yes, I drive an SUV.”

MAGA cultist preacher Robert Jeffress has argued that rainbows are God’s way of reminding us “that the polar ice caps aren’t going to melt and flood the world again.”

We can play this game for a very long time.

Then there are all the elected Republicans who say things like God will fix the environment without man’s intervention because “if there’s a real problem, He can take care of it.” Or that God will always “give us time” to solve the problem. Or that we should stop paying attention to environmental concerns altogether because God promised not to destroy the world… again.

It’s no wonder, then, that so many white evangelicals refuse to accept the connection between human activity and the climate crisis. They’re fed a steady stream of misinformation to the point where 49% of them say climate change is “mostly caused by natural patterns in the earth’s environment,” which means there’s simply nothing we can do about it. (Another 19% basically think it’s all a hoax, which is exactly what their preferred presidential candidate believes.)

The sad thing is that Christians could easily make the same argument that they’re required by God to take care of the planet that He gave them. After all, if Jesus doesn’t return for another couple of centuries, then it needs to remain sustainable for future generations of children. (Or, to put that in terms Republicans can understand, we need to save the planet for the future of fetuses everywhere.)

But science-denying white evangelicals, selfish to the core, don’t give a damn about the society they live in because they’ve fallen for the delusion that the afterlife is all that matters, so to hell with everyone in this world. Let it burn. They’re only here to make every problem worse.

snytiger6 9 Oct 13
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

5 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

White evangelicals (and I believe all evangelicals) have trouble accepting anything that is not attributable to their God.

0

I’ve still seen as much proof of Jesus as I have seen of climate change.

How about my grandmothers daffodils up & blooming almost a month earlier than they did 15-ish years ago?
Along with pretty much everything else!
In fact the climate zone planting maps have recently been revised.
I doubt dogwoods and daffodils listen to any nonsense.

Well it's happening all around you. You mean to tell us that you don't know about the retreat of glaciers all over the world? Or of invasion of tropical disease vectors into temperate zones? Or of record-breaking heat waves, floods, and forest fires? Or of the water levels in the great rivers of the world falling so low as to become un-navigable for the first time in recorded history? Or of migration patterns and habitation ranges of animals changing radically? Or of farmers having to change long established timing of sowing and reaping? Or of the disappearing sea ice in the Arctic Ocean? Or of the Keeling curve, which records the steady rise in atmospheric CO2 caused by burning fossil fuels, and the science (the 200 years of science) predicting that such a rise in greenhouse gases would raise temperatures globally? Where have you been? Do you live under a large, flat rock?

@Flyingsaucesir

You mean the temperature isn’t 100% the same any more? It’s hot in the summer and cold in the winter? Some days are warmer and colder? Some areas have drought and some flood?
Just like the past few million years????

Please……

@Esprit_de_Corp Fine. You are free to go on living under your rock. 😂😂😂

@AnneWimsey
Fall and spring temps change. Been doing it since I was a kid at least. I've seen snow in June and 80's on Christmas day.
I've also seen the global warming name change to Climate change when the warming narrative got debunked. Now it's just "Changing" because no one can argue that it's changing.

When the same politicians telling us that we have to pay more taxes to keep the ocean levels from rising sell their million dollar beach mansions in Martha's Vinyard and move to the mountain tops; then I may begin to consider it. Until then, anyone that believes that crap is an irrational idiot yelling uneducated nonsense.

Kind of like thinking that a bunch of millionaires and billionaires are going to hire 88,000 new IRS agents to go after millionaires and billionaires. Pure freaken ignorance.

@CourtJester Hahaha CJ, you crack me up! 😂 The science on global warming has never been "debunked." In fact, it has grown and solidified steadily for up to 200 years, if you count the first awareness that Earth's atmosphere could act like a blanket around the planet, slowing the escape of heat into space.

The term "climate change" was introduced by scientists because it better encompasses the full range of climate variations seen over the whole Earth. While the AVERAGE temperature at the planet's surface IS steadily increasing, changing wind and sea currents may result in local average temperature decreasing (at least for a time). I have attached a link to a good article on the various terms that are in use, and it gives a good example of how local temperature can go down while the global average goes up.

Rising sea levels poses a very real long-term threat to millions of people. We are already seeing higher storm surges due to a combination of higher sea level and more violent winds, inundating homes and other infrastructure. Sea level rose about one foot over the last 100 years; we expect another 2 to 3 feet of rise by the end of this century. But sea level rise is NOT the greatest danger we face from climate change. Heat waves kill more people (and livestock, and food crops) than do floods, fires, or winds. You can look at sea level rise as like a flashing warning light, or a canary in a coal mine: a harbinger of much worse things to come.

The thing is, we have a rapidly closing window of opportunity to stop warming the planet before feedback loops kick in and bring on an unstoppable upward spiral in temperature (and all the nasty effects that go with heating). If we carry on with business as usual, we are consigning future generations to life (and death) on an inhospitable planet. That would represent a moral failure of epic proportions.

[dictionary.com]

@Flyingsaucesir

How many times over the past 30 years were the ice caps expected to melt and kill us all??? They change the date every few years and it hasn’t happened.
Use your common sense rather than just listening to talking thing heads.

@Flyingsaucesir

How many of the people telling you that you have to pay more taxes to change the weather live in million-dollar mansions on the beach? If sea levels were going to rise and kill us all, don't you think those in the "Know" would find a better place to live while they convinced us of pending doom?
I'll assume you've also never been to China, South America, India or Africa as well. If you had moved out of your mother's basement and explored the world a bit, you'd realize that the US and Europe are already the cleanest nations on earth. If China made a 1% improvement, it would do more that the US or Europe making a 10% improvement from our current level.

Do better.

@CourtJester
No one that has been to countries outside of the US and Europe can logically believe that anything we do will play much of a roll in the environmental compared to what others could do.
Get them to our level then tell us how we can improve from there.

@Esprit_de_Corp It will take centuries to melt Antarctica. That estimate has always been a long one. Hell, it's 2 miles thick in places. But portions of it could give way sooner (see Thwaits glacier), and the timetable for that keeps getting moved closer as retreat of the sea ice is accelerating.

Original (like 20 or 30 years ago) estimates for an ice-free Arctic Ocean in summer was end of this century, but it looks like we are going to get there much sooner now; probably before 2050. It's going fast. It used to be 20 feet thick year round. Now is barely 2 feet thick at its maximum, and slushy farther into winter than ever. Polar bears are starving because they can't hunt seals from atop the sea ice, because the ice is forming later and later every year. Entire native villages have had to move to higher ground as the sea has risen. Some islands in the Arctic are disappearing fast. As are many in the tropical Pacific. You have probably heard of the Maldives, right? An entire country is disappearing. Australia is taking them in as climate refugees.

@Esprit_de_Corp, @CourtJester For the entire 20th century, the USA was the world's greatest emitter of greenhouse gases. Around the turn of the 21st century, China passed us. They will have to go green just like the rest of us. Right now they have more electric cars than we do, but they also have more coal-fired power plants. As time goes on, mother nature is going to provide us all more and more incentive to change. Stay tuned.

You seem obsessed with rich people's beach houses. Some of them have already lost their homes (in San Diego, California, more to cliff erosion than storm surge). Norfolk, Virginia is seeing streets flooded regularly now, as is Palm Beach, Florida. High tides are coming up through their storm drains on sunny days. Many more homes are threatened, but sea level is rising at a rate of about 0.35 millimeters per year, so their inundation is not necessarily imminent. That's ⅓ of a millimeter per year, 1 millimeter in three years, 1 centimeter in in 30 years. Very fast by historical standards, but on a human time scale, kinda slow. At this rate, people don't need to move out right away. The question is, will that rate hold? The fact is, it is slowly accelerating, and could really speed up if a big glacier like Thwaits were to lose its footing and start sliding into the sea. And it looks like that is what is happening. Thwaits is grounded below sea level. There's a ridge below sea level that hold the glacier back, keeps it from sliding. But as warmer sea water is now melting the sea ice, that ridge loses its ability to hold back the glacier. If it goes, sea levels will jump up quick. But nobody knows for sure when this will happen. People might as well stay in their beach homes, for now.

@Flyingsaucesir

The climate will always change. The earth has never been "perfect" for two days in a row.
Al Gore's home has the highest electric bill than any private residence in the entire state of Tennessee. If the other guys on the beach aren't concerned about global warming while sitting on their deck, I'm never going to be too concerned when they tell me I should be.
Millionaires from all over the world fly in their privet jets to one part of the world every year just to talk to us about climate change. Why not save the planet with a zoom call??? What kind of idiot see's that and thinks it's legit?

@CourtJester Air travel has the biggest carbon footprint per passenger mile. It take a lot of energy to keep a jet in the air. Zoom would be a much better option. But again, you're putting way too much importance on sea level. It's the heat that's the real killer.

@Flyingsaucesir
Hahahahaha

@Esprit_de_Corp I hope you're still laughing in 2050. I will laugh with you.

2

80% of White Evangelical Christians voted for Trumpty Dumpty in 2020. Most of them still believe the fiction that he won. That ain't the only fiction they believe in, the credulous bovines.

They are conditioned to believe it is alright to believe what you want to believe no matter what the facts are, or what the evidence says.

@snytiger6 Exactly. Faith is valued over fact-based reason.

1

That’s pretty much all things factual in nature….🤨

3

Name one thing white Evangelicals are good for........
Oh, wait, hate!
And meddling in others business
And attempting to run my life.
And being loud and obnoxious

To be continued......
I have to get ready to go to karaoke tonight.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:733768
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.