Is it really free thinking to dismiss the possibility that God or Gods exist?
Freethinking includes being able to accept that there are phenomena that one cannot grasp without feeling the need to invent a magician who is behind all the mysteries. Gravity, magnetism, quarks are all rather mysterious for the outsider, but they don't necessitate the invention of a god or hordes of gods.
new concept to me. Atheists are closed minded Always thought free-thinkers were open minded
@wmou open-minded about what? I guess there are all sorts of Atheists around.
I consider myself open-minded. But I just don't except the idea of any "god" ... But I also admit that I have met a few goddesses in my life. The French car maker Citroen made one ... It was simply called DS which sounds like deesse (goddess).
No. Free thinking is assessing the possibilities and coming to the determination of what is real. One must consider all possibilities before one can make the determination of what is and is not plausible or fact. If one rejects information before one considers its merit they are not a free thinker.
This sounds reasonable ... But plausibility is not universal. And occasionally certain phenomena seem to be contracitiory. Einstein had trouble getting his head around quantum theory because it seems to be contradicting the relativity theory.
@PontifexMarximus i'm sure others could make hamburger out of my simple logic on this one it seems a bit circular and contradictory but one must asses a thought before one rejects it. I have spent a few years now trying to wrap my head around Quantum theory and Relativity. I usually stop before my head explodes, I understand that may be frowned upon by people close by who do not like getting grey matter all over their clothing.
Which god are you talking about?
@icolan Are you the OP? Could you let the OP speak for him/her self?
@icolan I did not tell you not to comment or can't comment, Well, it is already wrong by assuming and you think that you can read the op mind that is somekind of bullshit ability that a lot of idiots think they have. That was what I am trying to point out to you. I was asking the OP not you. Unless you have the ability to read the OP mind.
@icolan I rather have the OP answer, because that is his thoughts, For one fact we all have different thought to one thing. We do have different view and opinion. So, thank you for your opinion, but I rather have the OP thoughts than yours.
@icolan I did not replied to your comment. I asked you questions. Read it again.
Free thinking includes the ability to dismiss it.
Freethinking used to be a code word for being an Atheist when it was more of a dirty word.
Yes, of course.
The god paradigm is something evolution is moving humanity past at its painfully slow pace. Eventually one more god receeds to the realm of myth.
As expected, your poll so-far, shows a majority for yes.
I chose no. The question's form necessitated it. While it makes sense that a person who thinks freely/independently would reject existence of gods; given the total lack of evidence, it doesn't all by itself, qualify one as a free thinker.
I've read many an opinion post here and elsewhere by atheists that show little to no progress toward actual independent thinking or unwillingness to worship this or that godlike personality as blindly as any Fundamentalist praises Jesus or Mohamed.
Free thinkers aren't characterized by romanticized gushing and rapturous praising of personalities as one sees so blatantly in the political realm. It matters not which end of the socio-political spectrum. They one and all worship their leaders blindly and curse and demonize the opposition's leaders. It's like a mindless pack of juveniles cheering and jeering at a Punch and Judy show.
That said, it is also IMPOSSIBLE for any independent thinking person to evaluate and decide upon a position on ANY hotly disputed topic or candidate in the socio-political minefield without being categorized by one or the other opposition as arch-evil, deluded or worse yet, stupid! Why? Because dedicated partisans can only see things in pack terms causes them to attack anything that invades their barren intellectual territory as viciously as a pack of dogs will attack violators of their physical territory.
Many politician, and for that matter, scientist worshiping atheists have a long, difficult journey. Dare to question. Dare to argue. Dare to refute. Dare to be called names and to be hated. That is exactly what will happen. There might be no such thing as entirely free thought, but rejection by all lunatic fringes is the best evidence of at least being on the road to a state of intellectual freedom.