Agnostic.com

2 1

LINK Trump argues judge preventing him from using defense his own lawyers declined to use -- The Hill

By Zach Schonfeld - 05/29/24

NEW YORK — Former President Trump claimed Wednesday that he is being prevented from mounting an advice-of-counsel defense in his hush money trial — a defense his own lawyers made clear months ago that they would not invoke.

A formal advice-of-counsel defense would enable the former president to argue he was acting reasonably based on what lawyers around him were telling him.

Trump is on trial in New York for a hush money payment made by former Trump fixer and lawyer Michael Cohen to porn actor Stormy Daniels. Prosecutors say the payment to keep quiet about an affair was disguised as a legal expense and meant to influence the election. Trump denies the affair and involvement in the payment to Cohen, who was reimbursed for the money.

The jury is likely to begin deliberations Wednesday.

In a series of Truth Social posts following Tuesday’s closing arguments, Trump raised the legal argument.

“Kangaroo Court!” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “A corrupt and conflicted judge. Reliance on counsel (advise of counsel) not allowed by Merchan, a first.”

In a post issued Tuesday night, Trump had also complained about not raising an advice-of-counsel defense and called the case a “rigged trial.”

But Trump’s own legal team made clear in March that it would not invoke a formal advice-of-counsel defense.

Despite not invoking the defense, Trump’s lawyers had indicated they wanted to still introduce evidence concerning the involvement of lawyers in the hush money arrangements at the center of the case, an argument the judge dubbed a “presence of counsel” defense.

“To allow said defense in this matter would effectively permit the defendant to invoke the defense he has declared he will not rely upon, without the concomitant obligations that come with it. The result would undoubtedly be to confuse and mislead the jury. The Court can not endorse such a tactic,” Merchan wrote in a March ruling.

Trump faces 34 counts of falsifying business records over payments made to Cohen, who had given Daniels $130,000 just before the 2016 election to stay quiet about an alleged affair with Trump. The former president pleaded not guilty and has denied any wrongdoing.

After the judge gives his final instructions, the jury of 12 New Yorkers is expected to begin deliberations late Wednesday morning to decide whether to hand up the first criminal conviction of a former U.S. president.

snytiger6 9 May 29
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Imagine the outrage from the right if Obama or Biden paid off someone to conceal an affair.

It isn't so much that he paid someone off to hide an affair. It is that he attempted to hide and use the payment as a business legal expense and not report it as a campaign contribution/expense, which brings us into the legal territory of his having committed fraud (again).

@snytiger6 My point still stands. 🙂

2

Advice of counsel defense requires that you waive confidentiality, just another Trump bullshit bluff. Like testifying himself the last thing Trump wants is having to let the truth get out.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:757199
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.