A Pandemic of ‘Russian Hacking’

Neither the actor, nor the motive, nor the damage done is known for certain in this latest scare story, write Ray McGovern and Joe Lauria.

The hyperbolic, evidence-free media reports on the “fresh outbreak” of the Russian-hacking disease seems an obvious attempt by intelligence to handcuff President-elect Joe Biden into a strong anti-Russian posture as he prepares to enter the White House.

[consortiumnews.com]

{Interestingly, this latest hack story came out a day before the Electoral College formally elected Biden, and after the intelligence community, despite numerous previous warnings, said nothing about Russia interfering in the election. One wonders whether that would have been the assessment had Trump won.

Instead Russia decided to hack the U.S. government.

Except there is (typically) no hard evidence pinning it on Moscow.}

{While asserting throughout his piece that, without question, Russia now “controls” U.S. government computer networks, Bossert’s confidence suddenly evaporates by slipping in at one point, “If it is Russia.”}

This shit can't be made up. !Wait! !This shit is made up!

{The analysis the corporate press has relied on came from the private cyber-security firm FireEye. This question should be raised: Why has a private contractor at extra taxpayer expense carried out this cyber analysis rather than the already publicly-funded National Security Agency?

Similarly, why did the private firm CrowdStrike, rather than the FBI, analyze the Democratic National Committee servers in 2016?}

Let us remember, it was McGovern and the rest of the CN VIPS group who deciphered the supposed 2016 hack, exposing it more likely to be a leak. Also noting that the DSA is capable and does capture all electronic movements made and able to track them back to the source. The DSA along with the DOJ should be doing their own fucking jobs! There in is a legitimate reason to be quite concerned about agendas being present.

{There was no denying the authenticity of those DNC emails published by WikiLeaks. So the Democrats mounted an artful campaign, very strongly supported by Establishment media, to divert attention from the content of the emails. How to do that? Blame Russian “hacking.” And for good measure, persuade then Senator John McCain to call it an “act of war.”

On Dec. 12, 2016, Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) used sensitive intelligence revealed by Edward Snowden, the expertise of former NSA technical directors, and basic principles of physics to show that accusations that Russia hacked those embarrassing DNC emails were fraudulent.

A year later, on Dec. 5, 2017, the head of CrowdStrike, the cyber firm hired by the DNC to do the forensics, testified under oath that there was no technical evidence that the emails had been “exfiltrated”; that is, hacked from the DNC.}

In other words. If you're still thinking the 2016 DNC emails were hacked by Russians, you're still living in a conditioned mind state.

{His testimony was kept hidden by House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff until Schiff was forced to release it on May 7, 2020. That testimony is still being kept under wraps by Establishment media.}

This also has ties to Ukrainegate on the CrowdStrike front involving Biden. Schiff was a major player being pushed by the military industrial complex to sell weapons to Ukraine. Under the Obama administration to overthrow a democratically elected government and quell any federal investigations there into Hunters true placement on an energy corporation there. Eventually ending up in a civil war and genocide of Eastern Ukrainians of the Russian sect. If this manufacture Russiagate wasn't able to become successful, all that information on both aspects would have made its way to the public. The entire whole of reputations of the entire core of DC depended on this illusion to be successful. This is as relevant in lines with the fabricated Iraq war!