An Open Letter to Maria Svart, National Director of the Democratic Socialists of America

[wsws.org]

{The involvement of leading members of the DSA in this anti-Trotsky campaign clearly indicates that it was a coordinated response to the WSWS’s criticism of Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez, which had been read by thousands of DSA members. Rather than attempting to reply to the WSWS with legitimate arguments, the DSA leaders descended to the level of political pornography.}

In essence, this is everything I built this group on. This site provides me/us the ability to attempt to educate others on better news sources more aligned with factual discovery, over the fake news we receive from MSCM and a host of other online sources and groups who tow establishment narratives. That would include the DSA and Jacobin Magazine. Who has Bhaskar Sunkara as the DSA vice-chairman and Jacobin editor-in-chief sharing the same goals between the 2 entities. [wsws.org] You can find the history of the DSA and Social Alternative in the above article as it's also correlated to the 2016 election cycle.

I and others in this group have gone through this very type of "political pornography" in this group while attempting to conduct an honest debate on articles posted here many times with various people. Tactics of such come with changing the context of the narrative of the article and or comments I make as I read through an article to falsely support repetitive rhetoric found from conditioning sources with no actual substance, rather than addressing the facts and conjecture within.

Another common issue is commenting on the article or my commentary without actually reading the article. You can't possibly arrive to a point of producing a genuine debate of substance without reading the article based on rhetoric from the outside if you haven't compared it with the information within the article. Or attack my commentary for the same reasons. And we've caught and seen this multiple times. People make it so obvious it's ludicrous. Plus, I'm often still proof reading my post or working on another one when people like or make snap ridiculous comments in as little as a couple of minutes telling me there's no possible means they read the article. You're not hurting me, you're hurting yourself, and possibly a fellow member who has a genuine desire to learn what the groups directive has to offer if they leave due to that intellectual obstruction.

{The assassination of Leon Trotsky was the culmination of savage repression between 1936 and 1940 that targeted the socialist working class and intelligentsia. Within the Soviet Union, Stalin’s decision to eradicate socialist opposition to his regime resulted in approximately one million executions. The victims included not only the Trotskyist opposition, but all those who had played a significant role in the October Revolution and the early years of the Soviet Republic. The Stalinist terror claimed the lives of major Soviet writers, scientists, and artists.}

When someone attempts to sell you on how many people communism has killed. It acquires the absent minded realization of how many capitalism has killed, and socialist with genuine societal agendas have been killed by capitalism and those within a system just as harmful. Those 2 systems actually functioning towards the same goals.

{In fact, as Eric London’s article documented, many of these individuals have connections to the Democratic Party, a bastion of American anti-communism and imperialism. Its political strategists view the Trotskyist movement — which seeks to establish the political independence of the working class from the pro-capitalist Democratic Party on the basis of a socialist program — as a formidable enemy. It fears the potential of the Trotskyist movement to attract workers and youth who are being radicalized by the intensifying social crisis. The broad-based response to the WSWS’s criticism of Ocasio-Cortez’ defense of the Biden administration was seen as a confirmation of this potential.}

You might ask, why should I take this article to be a substantial means of useful information to redevelop my opinions on these issues. For the same reasons I talk about here on a regular basis. The article is full of facts and historic relevances. Attacks by both of Bhaskar Sunkara entities have been made on pure rhetoric without substantial address, unable to produce factual deniability. Discovery of proven relationships with voiced opposition and support of their agendas. That also correlates with democratic politicians such as the squad, AOC especially, who highly show signs of collaboration in contradiction. !Especially! the following which makes them no better than the rest.

{An organization that claims to espouse “democratic socialism” must make clear that it will not tolerate statements, in any form, that legitimize threats of violence against its political opponents on the left.}

You will never find this type of persona coming from the WSWS or SEP. As they genuinely address facts and actions with substantial means to better a world society for all of us.