In New Yorker interview, Ocasio-Cortez defends Biden and Pelosi, urges readers not to lose “hope” in reforming two-party system

On February 14, the New Yorker magazine published an interview with New York Democratic Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who is also a member of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA). {AKA--fake socialist.}

The interview was conducted by New Yorker editor David Remnick, author of a hagiographic 2010 biography of Barack Obama and prominent liberal promoter of the Bush administration’s lies justifying the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

{That should be immediately recognized as an oxymoron considering the fake divisional divide of the parties. But then fake is the underscoring reason it isn't if you're fully awake on the political atmosphere.}

[wsws.org]

{The purpose of Remnick’s interview, headlined “Is Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez an insider now?”, is to promote the New York Democrat’s flagging image as a political outsider with youth appeal. Remnick’s subheadline reads: “After three years in the halls of power, she’s seen the ‘shit show’ up close—and hasn’t given up on her vision for how to change it.”

The interview is a portrait of a conventional capitalist politician.}

In other words I have used here on multiple occasions. She's a fake socialist compliantly operating from the use of 2 fake socialist entities to deceptively herd these youth into the democratic party. Where their support will continue to provide a foundation that operates against their preferred desires for their country. It wasn't a mere coincidence that the DSA and Jacobin Magazine suddenly found vast fame on social media in 2016 with AOC quickly coming in behind them in 2018 and the squad being added in.

This enlightenment came upon the back of another fake socialist Bernie Sanders within the movement of his supporters genuine desire for a socialist structural change, in which he betrayed. Let me repeat that very important message. His supporters. Because Sanders did very little to build the ability to win that primary. As a matter of fact, he allowed what was obviously an orchestrated agenda for him to lose from Iowa to the end without a word. Then betrayed his promise at the convention. Then joined in the false Russian narrative with Clinton and the DNC to cover it up. Even though while in court it was virtually revealed how Sanders donations went to Clinton and the DNC can legally pick the candidate they want, which they did within a collaborate scheme of deception on voters.

When the democratic party recognized it made a grave err with placing Sanders, a spoken democratic socialist beside Clinton in 2016, thinking he'd gain little to no support due to that speak, a strategy had to be developed to combat all the socialist minded citizens who came out of their sleep in droves finally getting their potential opportunity. They had no coherent thought of how many people were ready for a major shift in the fake divisional power structure the establishment and their media project. AOC was quickly manufactured under false narratives as Joe Crowley was awarded a promotion to become a lobbyist and group think towards wealth. The squad was developed to enhance AOC's new found false glorification.

{The interview is most notable for what Ocasio-Cortez did not say. In the course of a 6,000-word interview that is largely about herself, she made only one passing mention of the coronavirus pandemic, which has now killed 900,000 Americans, including many thousands of her own constituents in the Bronx and Queens.

She made no reference to the provocative threats made by the Biden administration against Russia}

Which is totally unacceptable by any politician no matter what area of the political spectrum they come from.

{When asked whether she supported Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House, Ocasio-Cortez replied in typical politician-speak that she opposed any leadership challenge:

“It’s really all about a specific moment that we’re in. We are in such a delicate moment of the day-to-day, particularly with the threats to our democracy.” In other words, Ocasio-Cortez argues that it would be improper to challenge the right-wing leadership of the Democratic Party due to the right-wing leadership of the Republican Party. Whether the “moment” for a leadership change will eventually come is “a larger question of conditions and circumstance.”}

In other words. A word even. Compliance. Weighing and evaluating factual information will not be tolerated. Exposing horrendous manufactured agendas rather than points of genuine advancements must be deceptively controlled talking points, only.

{These statements are in reference to a party whose leadership recently passed a resolution declaring that the January 6 coup attempt was “legitimate political discourse.” Ocasio-Cortez cites the danger of the far right as a reason to support Speaker Pelosi and at the same time urges readers to “appeal to the good natures” of the party that is the primary source of that danger.}

There has been so many indications she's an air head it's pathetic she's a representative of the American people. Even within this manufactured structure of deceit. But it works for them It clearly explains how she was falsely portrayed as a simple bar tender to being a representative in such a short span, virtually over night with virtually no campaigning.

{But Ocasio-Cortez regained hope when she ran for Congress as a Democrat. The way to combat “hopelessness,” Ocasio-Cortez said, is to apply pressure to those in power to encourage change from within the political establishment. “When people start engaging individually enough, it starts to amount to something bigger” and “threatens the legitimacy of mass-media outlets, institutions of power, etc. It has to get so big that it is unignorable, in order for these positions up top to respond.”}

She contradicts her prior statement.

{The reality is the exact opposite of what Ocasio-Cortez and the DSA claim. The greater the demand for change from below, the more ruthless the Democrats are in pursuing the interests of the financial aristocracy and suppressing social discontent.

Aware of the danger of growing social opposition to war, inequality and the threat of dictatorship, Ocasio-Cortez discouraged readers from using words like “capitalism” and “socialism.”

“We have to talk about patriarchy, racism, capitalism, but you’re not going to have those conversations by using those words,” she said. Instead, “You have to have those conversations by really responding in uplifting moments.”}

Unlike Jill Stein who actually provided a physical presence on multiple occasions, AOC is completely absent when it matter most. Here's something you might not know about AOC, being it's one of the hidden in the false narrative of her arrival on the political scene. While in collage she served in Ted Kennedy's office of immigration issues and foreign affairs. {"I was the only Spanish speaker, and as a result, as basically a kid – a 19-, 20-year-old kid – whenever a frantic call would come into the office because someone is looking for their husband because they have been snatched off the street by ICE, I was the one that had to pick up that phone. I was the one that had to help that person navigate that system."} Yet while Trump had and now Biden has a major inhuman situation going on on the border, her experience there is non-existent. Has she even spoken of the experiences she could apply to the very same aspects that are a major issue on the border? The border doesn't even make the news today! While this issue virtually engulfs her existence within life, silence becomes her for their existence within our society. It's socially and politically criminal on her part!

{It is notable that Ocasio-Cortez also made reference to growing criticism against her from the left, noting that “some ‘principled leftists’” have opposed her use of political stunts to cover for conventional Democratic Party politics. The fact that Ocasio-Cortez uses the term “principled leftists” in scare quotes, as an insult, only further exposes her role as an unprincipled conventional capitalist politician whose role is to block the development of a socialist movement independent of the corporate-controlled two-party system.}