I'm an agnostic atheist. I didn't believe in any god, but I can't say for 100% sure there is no god.

May I respectfully suggest taking some time to organize your thoughts, gather some information, and maybe trying to make your point again, in a different way?

Your post touches on a lot of different subjects in a way that makes your logic hard to follow. I think you also impute a lot of thoughts and attitudes to the labels "agnostic" and "bisexual" that most actual agnostics and actual bisexuals would resist. I can understand that some folks here might actually have taken offense, and please recognize that they're saying so in muted, polite ways.

We're here together in this community to learn from each other and support one another. So please take my comments as constructive criticism: while I suspect linking agnosticism and bisexuality is an intellectual stretch that reaches too far, maybe you've got an idea or an argument that could be fleshed out and add value (whether you meet with agreement or disagreement). I encourage you to try again.

This point of view sounds like the negative of a photo with a desire for a black and white world. The opposite of belief in god is an absolute non belief which the only true fact is belief. There is no proof on any side to substantiate it. Funny how after a hundred thousand years the concept hasn't changed, it's just been redressed.

Since God has never been properly defined and always comes down to a "it is beyond our understanding" answer as to what defines God
How exactly do you prove it is not so, when what it is is not defined?

Your conflating conceptual notions with practical reality.
You can imagine inter-galactic Space cruisers like in Star Wars or Star Trek, right?
Can you disprove their existence in practical reality?
Nope, all we can do is say we have never seen any evidence of any such thing in practical, empirical reality. We cannot rule out their existence elsewhere (we have not been there to see) or their invention.
Nor would you de-facto believe in such things in practical, empirical reality.
Nor do you feel any impetus to disprove them.
Why?
Because it is socially normative for them to be an idea which is not real (but might be, or could be)

Thusly we can fail to believe due to lack of evidence (even as we do to Star Cruisers), but have no practical, empirical way to disprove the notion of God, as undefinable as it is.

Nor any impetus to do so, I am not claiming there is some God as I cannot show any such God. The claim lies with the claimant, and the responsibility to prove said claim stays with them. It is their failure to prove such claims which drives us not to believe.

P.S.
THIS "Agnostics are the bisexuals of the philosophical community." would be offensive to most of the LGBTQ community I have met, it is derogatory and connotes an opinion that bi-sexuality, or bi-sexuals are somehow Gays afraid to admit they are Gay.
This paints you as either ignorant of this, or prejudiced against LGBTQ peoples.

It sounds like you're confusing being bisexual with being indecisive. There's people that like like chocolate and hate vanilla, others that like vanilla and not chocolate, and still others that like both.

You're not going to win as many people to your point of view if you make them defensive by being ignorantly offensive about their (or their friends' sexuality

You're seem to be mixing agnosticism and new age woo.

A positive assertion, even a negation, requires proof.

But when it comes to actually if balding as? Is that your summary statement?