Not a fan of the article; there's no concrete solution provided. My whole bit in environmental advocacy, starting in 1997 with an article "My Own Private Kyoto" is that climate change and exterior-environment lung disease can both be handled IF AND ONLY IF THEY ARE HANDLED TOGETHER and INDIVIDUALS HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO GET A CUT OF COST SAVINGS IF THEY REDUCE THEIR OWN EMISSIONS. Thirty million Americans (1) commute alone in a car to work, (2) live and/or work in an EPA warning or danger zone, and (3) are within a short bicycle-friendly (or E-bike or electric scooter-friendly) distance to work. If half of those folks switched a commute to anything BUT a solo car ride, half of the societal savings would be $10,000 over ten years PLUS a $40,000 10-year saving from reducing automobile use. Have you ever heard anyone in global warming say that individual people could benefit from individually reducing carbon and ozone, particulates, and nitrogen oxides?