Agnostic.com

2 1

On Sporting Events

Thanks @Piece2YourPuzzle for your post about Idolizing sports stars, it reminded me of my own feelings towards sports which I felt was different that your original post and needed it's own.

Here it is;

Everyone who has ever been a spectator at a sporting event of any kind has, at one time or another, experienced the bellowing of obscenities, racial or religious epithets, abusive sexual remarks to women in the vicinity, fistfights between strangers and fistfights between friends.

A child who watches acts of violence committed by thieves, murderers, or sadists in films or on TV knows that society disapproves of these acts. The child who watches sports is taught that the athletes' acts of violence are approved of. Sports play a major role in reinforcing the concern with success, winning, and dominance to the point that on the sports field these goals alone justify illegal and violent acts. Children see these images on the field and believe it is okay for them to act in this fashion because their favorite athlete is acting in a violent manner. Competitors in violent sports may not keep the violence on the field, it's all too easy to find many stories of a major athlete who comes home only to beat his wife.

It is not just the violence and the image of fans baying for men’s blood, but the overall specter of moral decline that makes Roman Gladiatorial games such a potent comparison with Modern Sports. Moral decline will inevitably result from the final abandonment of amateurism as arête and civilization give way to professionalism’s profit, corruption, and brutality. Audiences, owners, and gladiator-athletes are all complicit in this decline by choosing money over the moral high ground. The focus on stardom and spectacle have ruined nearly every level of sport, not just professional or collegiate: Call it a gladiatorial class. Families, schools, and towns wave 12-year-olds through the toll booths of life. Potential sports stars, who might bring fame and money to everyone around them, are excused from taking out the trash, from learning to read, from having to ask, ‘May I touch you there?’ It is a class of pampered sports stars trapped in permanent adolescence by the lack of any expectations or duties beyond entertaining the public and playing well.

The similarities between Roman Gladiatorial games and Modern Sports can be made as early as, if not sooner, with college sports. Of course, student-athletes are not paid for their labor, but others make enormous profits from their efforts. This is particularly true for the most lucrative of college sports, football and basketball. For many, this amounts to exploitation, one reason for comparing college athletes to gladiators because most true Roman gladiators, that is, those trained to fight and not criminals or prisoners condemned to execution in the arena, were slaves. And, although they received monetary prizes and other gifts for their victories, the overall profits went to their owners. Gladiators, like modern student-athletes, incurred the risk of serious injury or death while performing this valuable labor for their masters. And like slaves and gladiators, more bodies can always be found to take the place of an injured or dead one. A university can rescind a student-athlete’s scholarship if he or she suffers a career-ending injury or does not perform up to expectations. The student-athlete is thus caught in the same paradox as the gladiator: in one breath, they are active agents doling out violence, and in the next, passive pawns in a system that denies them any rights or recourse.

DreadlySmart 5 Jan 19
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Dreadysmart you live up to your moniker.

I made a post somewhere else but I try to not let my ego inflate when intellect is involved (though apparently I wasn't modest when choosing an alias... though hindsight I think I was just trying to be punny and modesty or ego had little say).

Some things sure I feel I could wipe the floor with the opposition in a debate, but I know there are several things that I am no more knowledgeable on than your common house fly.

But I do appreciate the compliment, it helps combat the depression so Thank You.

@DreadlySmart It is easy to recognize that you are not pompous. That being said no matter what our strength is it is wise to use it.

@DavidLaDeau, I like that, and again Thank you... I think I hold back because I am in constant doubt, and do fear, despite my I don't care what other's think facade, that I would be seen as pompous, but if I don't use it then I'm holding myself back and perhaps others, if they could have benefited from it(which in my head sounds arrogant but we've all got our demons to overcome and I'm starting to see that mine is knowing my true value[maybe?])

@DreadlySmart I struggle with the fact that while I do not think I'm smarter than anyone else, but I do think differently. I'm always focused on life's bigger questions, I spend a great amount of time thinking about such things like philosophy while in line ordering a hamburger. The poor girl at the register has to deal with the fool with the distracted deer in the headlights look. It makes things difficult for everyone.

1

You've got a lot here. See you are showing a correlation between the gladiators of old and student athletes of today.

My original goal when I wrote this was to show how little we've progressed with entertainment since the blood sports of old. We want to see ourselves as a civilized or superior species, but our obsession with such a detrimental activity puts us lower than locust whom devour everything without consideration of the effects to everything around them.

Note: this comment stems from an intoxicated mind so I may have imprinted some buried anger within my choice of words, I apologize If it is interpreted as a personal attack on you; It is not, any anger I have is toward the idea we discuss and not you personally.

no problem @DreadlySmart.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:16714
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.