Agnostic.com

12 0

Being various levels of non-belief, do you think “evil” is really a thing? That almost feels like an unknowable source. There’s definitely bad, but evil?

Howitstarts23 6 Sep 1
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

12 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

On the whole the comments on this thread continue to think evil as supernatural or related to fictions such as ‘the Devil’ or ‘Hell’. Evil is not a supernatural thing. It isn’t even theoretical. It is part of our human condition. Everyone has the capacity to lose themselves and become evil, if their conditions change. Look what ordinary people did under Pol Pot, or the genocides in Rwanda where people who had previously been friends and neighbors, chopped each other up with machetes and raped women and children. Evil isn’t relative when you are being water-boarded, or have electrodes attached to your feet, or when you are shot at a massacre at a mall. It’s very real and part of our capacity we don’t want to accept. Therein is the danger - total lack of self-awareness.

Livia Level 6 Sep 2, 2018

So..beware to just cast it aside so nonchalantly?
Interesting...?

@Howitstarts23 This is long, but it’s an interesting subject for me.
So, most people think they have a clear idea of who they are and what their core values are, and think these things are permanent. However, contrary to people’s own views about themselves, many things humans regard as fixed parts of our personality are for most, very susceptible to change under environmental or circumstantial change.

For example a normal boy who is a college football player may, in other circumstances, use his team playing and leadership skills to pull others in intimidation and pack behavior, if he is given free range and power as a leader. We see this during military and fraternity hazing.

During civil conflicts, neighbors may rape and kill each other, once the ethnic or ideological difference has risen to a point where their former neighbor is othered and then dehumanized. People who would not normally hate and kill will do so if they feel threatened or become disgusted by another group, under extreme duress. This happened in Rwanda and Kosovo.

Othering and dehumanizing people a very sure way to bring out the evil part of our ourselves. That is what happened during Abu Ghraib.

At Abu Graib Prison, Iraq, young and inexperienced officers were left in charge of Iraqi POWs. Under the stress of war, and because they were environmentally unstimulated, they made up games during their boredom and confinement. The officers began to use creative ways to punish the people in their charge. The leader, with the support of the pack eventually took the games and creative punishments to the point of degradation, sexual humiliation and torture of the POWs, as evidenced by the pictures.

The prisoners were first seen as enemy combatants, so were othered from the beginning. As the conditions worsened and became less hygienic for the prisoners, they became more “disgusting” in the eyes of the officers, and in turn, this intensified the resentment and hatred felt by the officers. At that point that the officers saw the prisoners as subhuman.

Pack behavior, hierarchy and the bonding of the officers prevented “snitching” or other reporting of the abuse.

In this case, the agents of bullying and evil were previously reported to be kind, loving and of good moral character. They would never had done anything like this at home. Yet, in an Iraqi jail, in war time, they were not in a normal environment and did not behave as their normal selves - the conditions brought about their monsterous sides.
When the abuse was uncovered by a very senior officer and reported to US authorities a case was brought against 9 officers.

The families of these young officers were in absolute shock. Their loving daughter or son left for Iraq as good kids. Even the 9 defendants themselves couldn’t quite comprehend how far they took things and were deeply ashamed or did not recognize themselves looking back during their trials.

This is why we must be alert to the change in the conditions around us and to othering. Humans will always adapt to conditions around them, sometimes those adaptations will be evil.

Here is a list of conditions that I can think of where ordinary human evil can arise. There are probably more:
-Pack/mob behavior
-Being under threat
-Being under consistent abuse
-Extreme and enforced poverty
-Abuse of power in leadership
-The covering up of errors, deviant behavior or loss of control.
-Intentionally and unintentionally bad group dynamics
-Confinement
-Tone and intention during system set up
-Othering and dehumanization
-Group think
-Control of the narrative and abuse of information

I believe that sometimes these conditions converge, making the possibility of evil inevitable or sustained (and I see a great deal of these conditions converging right now).

I realize that not everyone is malleable. Some people have incredible integrity and will resist, but they are the outliers, not the standard.

It’s my view that we must always be alert to our own integrity and notice how we compromise to conditions or are pulled in by others, because that’s where everyday, mundane human evil is brought to the fore.

My mother taught me to understand this, after she had lived through WW2. Many ordinary Germans, French, Italians etc. thought Hitler was good, and right. They helped with the forced removal of Jews. They were not evil before the war, they didn’t hate their Jewish neighbors previously, but nevertheless they joined the push against the Jewish people. They began calling their former friends names. They boycotted their businesses. It started slowly and snowballed. Among the British, Hitler’s ideas were embraced by former colonialists who believed in racial superiority etc. His ideas were embraced by Europe and 8 million people died in the holocaust, 6 million of these people were Jewish. The others were Roma, gays, the disabled, socialists, and dissidents. Anyone who thinks that kind of evil is relative or a concept, or a silly word, can kiss my fat arse.
Un-supernatural , and ordinary human evil is always a possibility under the “right” circumstances. Read Hannah Arendt “Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil”
[g.co]

@Livia are you a teacher of the subject?? That was comprehensively insightful-enjoyed reading it !

@Howitstarts23
Hi, thank you! I am a teacher but not on this subject. I like history, politics, philosophy, stuff like that.
What is interesting to me, is how evil begins, and it begins with people really pushing back on realizing it is part of them. Always be vigilant to your environment and how that influences your behavior!

0

Evil isn't a thing or a force but it's a characteristic some people have, or that their actions have, or that their motivations have.

g

1

Evil and sin are theological concepts. They have no more reality than other concepts that fall out of the faux discipline of theology, which is to say, they may have some tangential "truthiness" or be right twice a day like a stopped clock but for all practical purposes, can be discarded.

What is real are causes and effects, and the [un]desirability of the effects, on individuals, groups, and entire societies. The assessment of these effects are what societal morality is based on. We are constantly explicitly and implicitly negotiating what sort of society we want to live in, and what contributes to or tends to undermine that.

Since most of morality and ethics are based on empathy, what most people call evil reflects some significant empathy deficit. Sociopathy, psychopathy and extreme narcissism are the labels usually applied to the expression of what the religious term "evil" in their misguided attempt to use various imaginary carrots (eg., heaven, worldly blessings) and sticks (e.g. hell, worldly punishment, plagues) to shame or frighten scofflaws into submission. When in fact the problem with such people is they feel no empathy, and assume they are above or exempt from any sort of retribution. So ironically, such threats only actually influence people who have some internal integrity and discipline already, and maybe a few people who have weak integrity and low motivation to conform, but they don't actually touch the people who need it the most, which is those who are truly un self aware and indifferent to the suffering or feelings of others.

M. Scott Peck thought and wrote a lot about the nature of what we call evil and one of the hallmarks he suggested for telling if you're dealing with evil is that the behaviors, words and actions of "evil" people produce confusion in people who aren't evil, because normal people have so many internal checks / balances and controls within themselves that it would never occur to them to say or do the things "evil" people do because it would in a normal person produce intense shame and self-loathing to even consider such actions, much less commit them. Trump is an example of that, one of his short-term advantages is everyone keeps thinking there is some "bridge too far" that he will not cross, yet it never comes, because he's completely shameless and seeks narcissistic supply above all else.

To misdiagnose Trump, for example, as "evil" is not helpful because it doesn't make the diagnosis actionable in any meaningful way. If Trump were evil then we'd want to pray it away or overcome it with righteousness and then we're just wallowing around in theological concepts that are divorced from the real world. If on the other hand you understand Trump as seeking narcissistic supply then you can predict the things that will cause him to "decompensate" and make increasingly irrational and impulsive decisions, and you totally expect him to be ruthless the more he convinces himself he's invincible and not subject to normal rules that others are (and/or, threatened -- always unfairly so). You know exactly how to apply real pressure on him because you understand what he does and doesn't care about.

I'm picking on Trump to make a point, the same thing applies to any "evil" person -- they are not really evil, they are interpersonally and socially malformed and maladapted and this is what we need to understand, not to see them as in thrall to some thing-in-itself called evil or sin.

Wow, great stuff. I like the the correlation between lack empathy!

1

There are various degrees of "bad," evil bing the most devastating of all. It is hard to define where the line is drawn, but society has make the distinction in its laws, especially concerning murder. What we are currently seeing in the White House is wrong and bad, I am not a Trump fan by any means, but I hesitate to call it evil.

Nope, he is definitely evil and has created an evil administration around him that is literally tearing families apart. What do you call putting children in cages? Sort of bad? Not a good thing? No! It’s pure evil.

1

I define good as that which advances life and evil as that which impedes life.

1

We all know the difference between right and wrong without being told, it is inherent in all of us. There is good behaviour and bad behaviour and and extreme examples of bad behaviour could be called heinous or even evil but only when used as an adjective to describe behaviour. I do not believe evil as a noun is a valid word.
.

That’s a good distinction

1

Maybe not good and evil, but there is probably an assholery spectrum. If you're truly nice, you aren't on the spectrum, much like autism (you're either on it or not). I suspect most of us are on it, but on the lower end. This is all based on my non-expert opinion and is derived from the AEDB (anal extraction database).

0

Can it all boil down to chemistry and programming (brain)

2

What evil got to do with anything here?. I think it's just semantics and nothing else

2

Definitely. Evil is a thing, but it is not supernatural. It’s part of the human condition. Each of us has the potential for really evil things. If people deny that, they are even more susceptible to doing evil without being cognizant of it. Read this book to know how everyday people can be monsters given the conditions. It’s more than just about the Stanford University Prison Experiment, it includes how evil structures in corporations, the military and other institutions affect the people within them to be evil themselves. The Lucifer Effect by Philip Zimbardo [prisonexp.org]

Livia Level 6 Sep 2, 2018

That was an interesting experiment, wonder how it would turn out if repeated today

@Howitstarts23 it can’t ever be repeated in the USA, as these days it would fail every criteria for ethical research standards. However you can see the experiment’s result played out daily in schools, prisons, hospitals, mental health facilities old people’s homes etc. I think it is one of the most important pieces of research ever done, and while most people know the general premise, it’s the detail and the speed of the deterioration of moral norms that is most instructive. Everyone should understand that book to avoid unconscious participation in evil activities.

1

Good and Evil do not exist. They're man-made constructs to keep sheep in line.

Tell that to the innocent people tortured in Abu Ghraib. Pain inflicted by people for fun or pleasure isn’t relative for the person on the receiving end. Or the children murdered at St. Joseph’s Orphanage by nuns. The Catholic Church is a very good example of structural evil.

That's not evil. That's shitty people doing shitty things.
AND you utilize the catholic church as an example? It's a pedophile ring. Riddled with psychopaths and sociopaths.
And how am I supposed to say anything to dead people?
Move along now. You're far too emotional to have a conversation with about this subject.

1

It's all relative. For example, if you shoot someone, it's wrong..unless that person was attacking your family with a knife.
It used to be considered "evil" to be gay, for women to wear make up or show their ankles, even to use a fork or a bathtub. Religious people keep changing the definition of evil.

Now, apparently, if it's Trump doing it, there IS no evil.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:169412
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.