Agnostic.com

3 0

One of the key differences between man and other animals is other animals adapt to their environment while man is unique in often adapting his environment to himself. It's a paradigm shift that can play havoc with adapting evolutionary models within anthropological frameworks.
Once you take into account the environmental engineering that man does traits lending towards social integration becomes obviously advantageous. The traits which allow the cooperation requisite for molding an environment more conducive to the species lead to their selection as the victory of one polis over another. The more cooperation the more the environment can be molded. This includes the citizens as elements of the environment. And so man's ability to adapt his environment to himself leads to the creation of social structures as the most effective, and therefore the most often selected, to realize this. In turn, the strongest social structures are those that allow the greatest number of citizens to realize the maximally socially productive potential. Inclusion is thus selected over exclusion.
Of course this is just my theory and is conjecture. I welcome any counterexamples.

Edit:
Thanks to everyone for pointing out other species that do this. I do think, however, that the way we alter our environment cooperatively (different from beavers) and that the cooperation is conscious and intentional (different from ants) might be singular.

towkneed 7 Sep 10
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

adaptation to one's environment is important to survival and evolution. adaptation OF one's environment is sometimes necessary, and humans are by no means the only animals that do that, so it does not set us apart except by virtue of the degree to which we do it. we are so prodigious at it, in fact, that we may just kill ourselves off destroying that very environment. this "ability," the way we use it, is more and more counterproductive.

g

True. We aren't the only animals to do it.

@towkneed we may well be the only animals to OVERdo it.

g

3

We forget sometimes that our animal friends are also engineers, not merely adapting, but modifying their local environment. Consider, for example, the evolutionary leap for the first beaver to fell trees in order to construct its dam and habitat.

2

I would tend to agree with much of what you say. There are animals, social builders, that will adapt their environment to some degree: ants and termites come to mind.

Beavers.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:176069
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.