Agnostic.com

11 12

The Judgement of Victims
I went to get my hair cut today and as so often happens, the conversation with the stylist ranged all over. We somehow got on the subject of sex trafficking and I relayed a story told to me by a man I dated for a minute.
His strangest date, he said was with a woman who, 45 minutes into the date,told him she was in the U.S. because she'd been sex trafficked here as a child and had spent time as a prostitute. He was understandably shocked and put off. I thought about what he'd said for a while though and I see why she may have been so forthcoming. I asked him how he would have felt if she'd waited a month or two to tell him and he admitted he would have been put off AND upset that she'd kept it from him. There was no "good" time to tell someone her story so I suppose she decided to get it out of the way and not waste anyone's time.
The stylist was understandably shocked too, as I had been. She mused aloud why the girl would tell anyone, ever and threw in that lovely phrase "people who've been abused like that are just damaged forever".

Why do we do that? Why do we mistrust and harshly judge victims of horrors? Why do we assume that they are just "broken" now and can't recover? It is so very cruel to keep punishing them for horrors they experienced through no fault of their own. To deny them the chance to tell their stories and to shun them. This , I think, is one of the ugliest sides of human nature but we all do it, don't we?

OpposingOpposum 9 Sep 21
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

11 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

I wouldn't look at this woman any differently than I do anybody else. I figured there was a reason she had to tell her story and I would be accepting of that. Everybody has something. Good for her for being brave. She is a true survivor.

2

no. we don't all do it. but too many do. people in power do it, too. it's being done right now to dr. blasey-ford, who, by the way, if she was just plain broken, would not have achieved what she has achieved.

g

1

Hell of a poignant post! And I see that there ate those who have responded here in an intellectually cautious way that would result in doing exactly what your hair dresser did: Blame the victim. We need to all learn that we all do judge because judgement is decision and decision about what is right for one determines the quality of one's right. So by all means judge the person For WhoSheOrHe is, not for what they could not control in their lives.

0

Because 'recovery' is an illusion? (albeit a pretty one)
Once something traumatic happens, you are never the same I disagree that you can't be as capable a person as you were before the damage, but you will never be where you could have been, with out the damage. thats how damage works.

Im not sure stating a truth is a bad thing.

recovery is not necessarily an illusion. you'll never be the same but that doesn't mean you'll be forever broken and useless.

g

Ooookay. I'm definitely going to argue that point with you. There was a fair bit of sexual abuse that went on in my extended family. My relatives who got help and counseling recovered and are living normal happy lives. Those who did not get help did in fact have their lives ruined. Writing off survivors of abuse or atrocity as "damaged" and beyond help dooms them to a hellish life. It's sort of a self fulfilling prophecy.

@OpposingOpposum I don't suggest writing anyone off. All I mean is that recover implies being made whole, and I really don't think you can be made whole. Some people are so damaged they never progress at all, and the loss essentially defines them. Others cope with the loss, and continue expanding as a person. for them, the loss slowly makes up less of who they are.

Im also not trying to imply one shouldnt seek help to recover. No one should live in that loss . It sounds like the woman in this story has her shit handled, and is doing everything she can to move forward. But if you ask her if she has recovered, I'd wager a hypothetical dollar she she would wonder if you had lost your mind.

I just don't think he is terribly in the wrong for knowing he isnt equipped to relate to someone with those kinds of experiences.

Does that make more sense? I feel like I phrased it poorly in the first post.

I think there may be a disagreement about semantics here. "Damaged"? "Broken"? "Never the same"? Aren't these all saying the same thing? My favorite metaphor is "Once nails are hammered into a fence, you can take them out, but the holes are still there....no matter how much wood putty you put in".
I had both a mother and husband who were abused to various degrees as children. They both were intelligent people who worked hard to overcome and from the outside, appeared normal and healthy. They both were loved unconditionally by their spouses and their children in long marriages; but they both were hollow inside and became narcissists who sucked the energy out of those who loved them in order to feed the facade. They were street angels and house devils.

So, yes, everyone must know themselves and their capacity to deal with any other persons history. I would feel absolute empathy for this woman and believe she did the right thing by telling her story immediately. Very vulnerable and courageous. And the guy has every right to judge his own ability to deal with this information and stay or go based on that.
No matter what, the "holes" are still there.

2

I don't disagree, but TBH, relationships are a lot of work even with a partner who has their shit together. It is possible that someone who was sex trafficked as a child would be very together, but there's a larger possibility that they have deep and entrenched "issues". I would not be automatically "put off" but I'd be VERY cautious. I'd want to see a lot of years of gainful employment in legal enterprises, lots of good quality friends, and extremely mature behavior and then I'd still be careful.

Also ... there was a time when I would have actually been attracted to that sort of thing because I had a Jesus complex a mile wide. I wanted someone to save. That's explains my first marriage, which also cured me of that problem.

Today such a person would have to conclusively demonstrate that they'd already saved themselves, as no one can do it for them.

1

Agreed possum

1

I would like to think that I would at least listen to her story, if she wanted to tell it. Once one gets past about 40 they have baggage, all of us have baggage. I would like to think honesty, forthcoming, truth, would count for something. With the political situation the way it is one has to survive, many of us may have to come to grips with situations they have no control over. May we all be able to deal successfully with them.

1

people like quick fixes and easy answers. Of course you can get over it, doesnt make it any less horrible, but dismissing it will. Giving a sound bite answer is definitely less than useful

0

Well let's just admit it that the human race is horribly flawed

2

I think my reaction to a story like that would have been one of sympathy and compassion. She was a victim. I do agree that these experiences potentially have a life-long impact, but wouldn't say they were "broken." Kind of a dumb thing to say IMHO.

1

I think that they many are very near broken and will stay that way if they never seek out counseling or report it to law enforcement specializing in trafficking.

My late younger sister was abused by her father (my step dad) and she never sought counseling or reported it and she had all of the emotional and psychological problems that come with it; multiple failed relationships, substance abuse, hyper promiscuity, anger issues, offspring estrangement are the ones I know of.

To properly heal from a traumatic event of any kind, victims need help. They can't do it alone. They are not permanently broken but they will never be whole like the person they were before the trauma. The best that they can hope for is to be repaired and the quality of that repair is based on the counselor and the effort by the victim. But it's never the fault of the victim.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:183925
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.