As pharmaceutical companies always put their own interests first and considering the amount of profit made on treatments is it in the interest of big pharma to find cures for cancer (105 billions 2015), HIV (157 billions), or even the flu (24 billions)? How much money would they have to sale the "cure" to balance their lost of revenue?
I've worked for a huge WW pharmaceutical company and had them as a customer. It was clear that they are in it for the money. There was never any altruistic objectives. As such fair enough in a capitalistic society - we should just not think its anything else. The best was is to have someone addicted to your products or services and you can increase the revenue and profits from it. This sets pharma companies up for lots of conflicting decisions. No pharma CEO would ever get rewarded for coming up with a cure that leads to less revenue or even making his company superfluous
The scientists that do the research have families and may also need a cure for themselves so if a cure exists someone someware would try to use and or leak that information. The companies can slow progress but they can’t stop it because humans are not all that good at keeping a secret. Nothing stays a secret forever unless nobody cares. As I type this I’m sitting across the table from my mother, it would be a good time for someone to leak a cure for dementia.
No it is not in their best interests to cure anything and I would not be surprised at all to find out that cures exist somewhere in a lab of big pharma.
Seems I saw something a while back where a pharma executive admitted that their business model was not sustainable if they found cures.