I guess a narrow, simplified version of history is more suitable to the SJW mentality along with virtue-signallers. SJW beliefs seem to trump facts and always create a fascist response to attempts to understand our society in an objective way. Flag-waving, mansplaining, judgemental and condemnatory statements like those posted above just seem to imply a neurotic personality unable to handle a different opinion.

@brentan or it's just easier to pass the buck.

I guess you have nothing after all!

@brentan nothing to counter name-calling and unsupported claims? I fail to see how anything you said necessitates any effort to refute it. If you had anything you wouldn't need to use name calling, straw-man fallacies, and claims of facism in place of a legitimate argument.

@JimG You were quite willing to try to refute when you thought you had an argument. Now you're reduced to using my arguments about you to criticise me. You really have nothing to offer by way of argument. Keep signalling!

Which in no way justifies anything or even contributes to a meaningful discussion, but if it makes you feel better, by all means continue to deflect.

sorry, was the post supposed to cover all bases? i think the poster was making her (quite valid) point, not making all possible points. but now that you've brought it up, there is that perpetual myth that women naturally hate other women and will climb all over each other to get ahead. myth it is, despite there being examples of it (there are examples of lots of crap, if you look for it, but those examples don't make the generality true). if any portion of what you've said is true, consider who was in power to control what women did or did not do, or did or did not feel they HAD to do, not to be completely suffocated. ALL of that notwithstanding, how does any of it, real or imagined, justify victim-blaming?

g

The post was not written to justify anything, rather to try to understand it. That interpretation was misapplied by the other person. The comment about women's maltreatment of women is a historical truth and not a myth. The fact that men ruled societies in no way excuses the unjust behaviour of women.

@brentan Find a way to connect how horrible women are to each other to the original post or else your comment is just another 'what aboutism'.

@kmdskit3 What you call whataboutism is a direct response to the idea that (cis) men in general, and men only, are guilty of this wrongdoing.So it was a pertinent comment.

@brentan It is a direct comment to cis men. Nowhere is there any indication that only cis men are the only ones guilty of this behavior.

To the cis men...
It isn't about all men...'

Guilty men can suck it up. The idea that all white men should suck it up is preposterous.