Agnostic.com

6 0

Are we all generally aware of the diff in Atheist and Agnostic?

bbyrd009 7 Oct 24
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

6 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

diffs plural, not diff singular, because not everyone agrees 1. on what the differences are or 2. that there are major differences. i don't lose any sleep over it.

g

1

There are easy definitions that are widely accepted yet many people are confused.

Dietl Level 7 Oct 25, 2018
0

Atheist: Lacks belief in any deities. NOTE: not the same as disbelieving, although calling it disbelief is a common semantic shortcut.

Agnostic: Lacks knowledge of any deities. NOTE: correctly speaking -- does not believe one CAN know anything about deities because they are inherently non-falsifiable.

The difference is that one describes the belief position about gods, the other, the knowledge position. They influence each other but can vary independently.

If you think gods are non-falsifiable then it's pretty hard to afford belief to them, and if you lack any god beliefs it's hard to stake a knowledge claim. So these are really just two side of the same coin.

1

It's easy:

Atheist (me): a person who does not believe in any gods.

Agnostic: doubts the existence of a god. A person who holds neither of two opposing positions on a topic.

"I don't believe in an invisible being that resides somewhere beyond the clouds," I say cheerfully to Christians who try to convert me.

Of course, it doesn't work. They always try to pin me.

"Can you see the wind?" a Christian zealot recently asked. "How do you know the wind exists if you can't see it?"

"Wind is scientifically proven and explained," I replied. "An invisible god is not."

how 'bout that Spooky Action at a Distance though, huh? 🙂

3

I don't think so, but I don't know for sure. 😉

0

Yes, more times than you want to know. The problem here is that when you state 100 percent that there is no god you have shifted the burden of proof to yourself and you must show evidence. There is no evidence either way.

Atheism is a belief. You no more have to prove it than does someone who believes in a supreme being(s). And, neither belief is provable, no matter how strongly held.

@Rob1948 Seems to me that I just said that but in different words. Matt Dillahunty says that when you state 100 percent that there is no god someone might want you to produce proof. Believers and non-believers alike have no proof. None at all. There never has been proof either way. I rate myself at 99.9 % sure that there are no gods.

@LunaBerry you state you are an atheist and that you “don’t believe in their God.”

Seems like a belief system to me. ?

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:207943
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.