Agnostic.com

3 2

The Simulation Hypothesis and Panpsychism.

Panpsychism is the concept that all things, even the fundamental particles, are to some degree or other, conscious. You'll often find in at least popular science tomes that this or that particles somehow "decides" to do this or that. For example, how does a photon "decide" to either pass through a pane of glass or reflect off of the pane of glass? How does a particle "know" if an observer is watching it? Of course, virtual photons or any other kind of particle will do what the software programs them to do.

The Simulation Hypothesis and UFOs.

It doesn't ultimately matter what's at the bottom or core of the UFO phenomena, UFO sightings have demonstrated that UFO behavior totally violates all of our understanding of known physical law, especially inertia. When it comes to UFOs in motion, inertia doesn't seem to exist, Newton be damned.

There are numerous sightings, both visual and radar, of rapidly moving UFOs stopping on a dime or undergoing super acceleration from a stop. There are reports of high speed right-angle turns, even instantaneous 180 degree reversals of flight direction.

Then you add into the mix sightings of UFOs that merge together or split apart; enormous sized 'craft' hovering in place without a sound; rapid gains in altitude without any obvious means of propulsion; radar returns without visual confirmation and visual sightings without radar returns.

So, computer-generated special effects to the rescue?

The Simulation Hypothesis and Crop Circles.

“It can’t be therefore it isn’t” vs. “I know what I saw” doesn’t really apply to the crop ‘circle’ phenomena. Crop 'circles' exist and are obviously the products of intelligent design. The only terrestrial intelligence capable of doing this are humans. However, that means that each and every crop 'circle' had to have been designed and executed by a human(s). That would appear to be an actual impossibility based on the evidence since crop 'circles' have appeared in areas where either there were no humans or humans would have been easily observed. So what is the ultimate physical reality behind or of this anomaly? Is there a physical reality if crop circles are part of the virtual reality landscape that is programmed as part and parcel of the overall computer simulation?

Simulation Hypothesis and the Bible.

The entire Bible (or any other holy book for that matter) could be simulated via computer software (and lots of parts have been 'simulated' via film on TV and in cinemas). You could imagine a computer / video game where you get to play God (or any other Biblical character) and create life, the Universe and everything, issue commandments, pass judgments, kill the wicked, battle Satan, denounce other gods, precipitate and engage in Armageddon or the apocalypse. Lots of fun! Or, one could redo the entire New Testament and make Jesus dance to your tune. Anyway, the point is if it can be done (and it can be done) then maybe that's the way it was done. Take Genesis: Once there was 'nothing' and then there was a something - the software kicked in; the Big Bang event happened; let there be light and there was light, etc. And the rest, as they say, is history.

johnprytz 7 Nov 26
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

"Panpsychism is the concept that all things, even the fundamental particles, are to some degree or other, conscious."

Theories about panpsychism are not monolithic. I think that panpsychism describes the effect of matter structured in a certain manner, the effect this structure we call awareness. I don't think a fundamental particles have consciousness/awareness, but they may have the potential to participate in such awareness depending their ability to be in the certain structural relationships, which we call life.

cava Level 7 Nov 27, 2018
0

Consciousness is hard to place my finger on I will admit. I do to a certain degree hold the view that consciousness is a gradient of some sort. That the smaller and less advanced a creature is the more primitive consciousness is. My question then is does it keep going all the way down to fundamental particles? Could any interaction that takes place be described as being aware simply because it is an interaction? Could it be that the only reason we seem different from things that supposedly aren’t conscious is because we are a highly developed form of it where countless interactions take place in the brain?

1

Inanimate objects don't make decisions. They are governed by physics, laws of Nature...

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:231518
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.