Oh for fuck sake!!! This is ridiculous!

But rap songs that openly advocate spousal abuse, rape and disrespect are cultural art?
Saucey humour and double entdre are an important part of western culture, this is a comedy song and jokes by definition have to have a but(t?) of the joke, being able to take a joke is part of our western culture too.
Anyone can do this with any song, so what? A part of the magic of art, lyrics, prose and poetry is the battle between the writer and the reader, the various interpretations, the cultural perceptions, the context.
Jacque Derrida made a career out of discussing this very idea.
Limiting art and thought, censoring possibilities is the gateway to oppression.

I think the me too movement is very important. That being said, you can look at this song in 2 ways. 1, the not taking no for an answer rapey way it sounds on the surface. I'm sure many of us have experienced a guy we clearly state we are not interested in be annoyingly persistent. The problem is we don't know if that annoying persistence will turn violent. Or 2, listen to it with the thought in mind that when this song was written, women weren't allowed to be sexually free. This song is her way of it being ok for her to eventually stay because "good" girls don't say yes right away because then they'd be "loose" and heaven forbid you give it up too easy. In today's world, this song would be a lot shorter if you know what I mean. (This leads into a much larger discussion about how women are taught to resist sexual advances even if they are interested and men are taught to pursue no matter what the woman says because she'll eventually wear down, but I need to get ready for work...)
There is something wrong with both scenarios, true, but maybe the song isn't as bad as it seems on the surface.

Its ridiculous.. I loved lady gagas rendition of this song

Humans suck at finding and maintaining balance in most things.
This whole thing is just so fucking stupid.
I absolutely hate revisionist history.

Let's rewrite even more of history because it hurts our ittle bitty feelings !!!!

Knee-jerk banning of material meant to be humorous, light entertainment merely encourages the fanatics to look around for more stuff to create a song-and-dance about (pun intentional)
If followed to its logical conclusion, society ends up with something akin to the puritan regime of Oliver Cromwell's regime, which even banned music in churches.
Society must never yield to PC fanatics. Freedom of speech includes freedom of music choice!

This controversy and discussion was happening way before the #metoo movement.. linking the two seems disingenuous

I support the MeToo movement but not the banning of this song. You have to ask yourself how many people are playing and listening to this song today? Is this song being used actively to get a point across about sexuality? How many times do radio stations play or promote this song?

You see, if we get involved in this in some ridiculous way we are close to the banning and burning of books also. Certainly that will come next if we allow the PC crowd to dominate or make a trend. Our society is screwed up enough already. What sort of censorship is this? We do not need censorship but we do need good common sense.