I have mixed feelings about this. On the one hand, of course I applaud the non-discrimination aspect, especialky since I was once denied a job for which I was totally qualified solely because I did not “accept” a mythical being as “my lord and savior.” On the other hand, defining non-beliefs as a form of religion is disingenuous and confirms popular misconceptions anout atheism/agnosticism. Knowing that FFRF knows this, however, leads me to suspect this is an “advocacy compromise” common when doing legislative work. All in all, good work FFRF!