Agnostic.com

6 1

IT TIME FOR THE UGLY TRUTH

How long we are going to allow the ignorance breeding ground to go free without blame? When will we hold the places of bigotry, abuse, narrow mindedness and fundamentalism responsible?

The truth is the breeding ground where the individuals committing crimes of rape, incest, murder, child abuse and even white collar crimes that destroy people's lives spend are as responsible.

Let us start holding them accountable with a mention at the time of conviction. Let this be a beginning.

  • 3 votes
  • 7 votes
  • 0 votes
  • 0 votes
  • 1 vote
St-Sinner 9 Mar 5
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

6 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Self-identified associations lead to misleading data. Many religious identifications are more cultural than actually religious. Any sort of research like this would have to be more nuanced.

0

Actively practicing religious people are much, much less likely to engage in criminal behavior than non-religious people.

[marripedia.org]

The practice of religion does not cause people to be criminals, but if you are booked into a prison and given a questionnaire to fill out, you’d probably check the traditional religion of your family. That doesn’t make you religious.

Religious training in prison is, however, an important part of the rehabilitation process.

@tkcoy No, I didn’t check the references. I can simply look at my own community and see that it’s not church folks who are getting arrested for crimes. I’m sure you could do the same for where you live.

[pop.psu.edu]

Here’s a Penn State study that confirms a positive influence of religion.

@tkcoy You are the one making the wild and weird claim that churches are breeding grounds for crime, and your mind seems set in concrete. I’ve presented you with various studies refuting your claim, but you either dismiss those studies as not being up to your high scientific standards, or you refuse to even look at them. A Penn State study would surely be valid and if you won’t read that nothing will persuade you.

I tell you what—Since you are the one making the claim, how about YOU presenting some studies to back up that claim. I’ll be waiting for your evidence, and if none is forthcoming I can only assume you are blowing smoke.

@tkcoy First of all, I apologize for thinking you were the person who made the original post. I see now that you were simply refuting or criticizing the first article that I linked. The post seems to imply that churches are the cause of crime, and I don’t think that’s true.

So far as pitweb.pitzer, it is a rough draft for a proposed article from ten years ago. IMO it is a somewhat disorganized mishmash of data, with hundreds of references. The article seems to be written to defend atheism and secularism rather than to analyze the effects of religion on society. The last paragraph frankly acknowledges this:

“Finally, it is important to acknowledge that what is missing from this essay -- and what is clearly beyond its limits -- are satisfying explanations for the many important patterns that we find. Why are men more likely to be atheists than women? Why is education correlated with secularity? Why are rates of irreligion so high among Jews and Asian Americans? Why are secular people more supportive of homosexual rights than religious people? Why is violent crime most heavily concentrated in the most religious regions of the USA? Why do the most secular nations on earth enjoy the highest levels of gender equality? Alas, such questions abound. We can only hope that continued social scientific research into the nature of atheism and secularity can begin to provide some satisfying answers.”

I have no problem with the defense of atheism—I have never had a negative opinion of atheists in general, and if I had I certainly wouldn’t be on this site. But this article simply doesn’t address the issue of whether religion has a positive or negative effect on society.

Much ado is made over the fact that more highly religious states and countries have the highest crime rates, greatest poverty, lowest education, etc. But you can not, based on that data, conclude that religion CAUSES crime, poverty, etc. Yes, Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana have somewhat higher crime rates, but to know why that is you would have to look at demographics. Who is committing those crimes? Is it devout church members? No it is not. It is a subculture of white trash and rowdy young Blacks. If you came from rural Georgia I’m sure you understand.

No one should think for a second that atheists are causing crime, poverty, etc. Atheists in general are educated analytical people who have the courage to escape religious dogma. You can not draw conclusions about the effects of religion based on such a select group.

Thanks for responding with that link. I’ll try to read the other one tomorrow.

0

Everyone should be required to take the MMPI. Then we can see what religions do to peoples heads, and not just wait for a violent or corrupt outcome. We already know that atheists are under-represented in prison populations. The religionists won't and don't care.

0

what a dreadful idea! not everyone who commits a crime does so because of his or her religion, and not everyone who has a religion commits a crime. to label each criminal by his or her religion would be to promote bigotry, and we have enough of that already!

g

0

Not really as religion will all get glossed over in the media.... He was a ...... turned evil.....

0

The media would likely report if they had an uncoventional/minority religion, atheist falls into this category in the US. The end result would be that the minority of atheists comiting crimes would recieve more media coverage while the christian majority would go unreported.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:304377
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.