Agnostic.com

3 2

Hey, I'm kind of curious as to WHY, exactly, the Convicted Child Abusing George Pell was PERMITTED to wear his Clerical Dog-Collar and Attire to the Appeals Court Hearing?
He IS a convicted Felon and as such has no RIGHT to wear anything other than a simple suit or his Orange Prison Garb just as required by ALL other Prisoners attending the Appeals Court.
Was this yet another 'sympathy' seeking ploy by his Legal team?

Triphid 9 June 6
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

I notice he is to face new charges for protecting a known pedo priest by moving him around to different parishes.

He wouldn't be the first in the history of the Catholic Church in Australia to have played the 'Paedo-Priest Shuffle Game" I'd bet.
It's been going on for Centuries everywhere that the filthy Church has set down its parasitic roots.

@Triphid It's such a pity god didn't make room for pedophilia amongst his ten commandments. Then the priests would've known it was wrong. And christians dare to ask me where I get my morals from.

@MsDemeanour Knowing and NOT DOING are two vastly different things amongst the Priesthood and a lot of the Faithfools imo.
At least we, Heathen Atheists/Agnostics for the most part that is, have Morals and Ethics that are instinctive and Non-reward oriented unlike the supposed ones of the Faithfools that are solely and primarily based upon gain Kudo Credits with an Invisible, Imaginary Sky Daddy.

1

Me too. I bet you he will be let go.

If that occurs I reckon it will rank highly amongst the BIGGEST Travesties of Justice in Human History.

0

Of course his defense wanted that.

I wonder how many of the Tribunal Members are religious and/or devout Catholics then.
My opinion is that in such cases as this and those like Paedo-Pell was found guilty at the Judge/Judges SHOULD either Agnostics or Atheists simply because there'd be far less chance of religious influences affecting their decision/s.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:357569
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.