The word "sacred" connotes, or even requires, a god; so, to me, nothing is sacred. This does not mean that I cannot revere (have deep respect for) some thing, or someone, or some place (Gettysburg or Ground Zero, for example). I will revere something held by a distant relative more than something held by someone with no connection to me; or, even some object that has great historical significance, for instance. But, as for something of no historical consequence that was touched by someone famous? To me that means nothing--unless it was touched by Idris Elba...or Bill Nye...or Neil deGrasse Tyson...or...JK .

I believe that all life is "Sacred". Read Albert Schwietzer's "Reverance for life" I love his outlook on the subject. He lived a very selfless life that may have put even Jesus to shame. The Native American believed that the buffalo was sacred, although sustaining their populations by killing them for food, clothing and so much more. .They said a prayer of Gratitude for the slain animal, and they never killed for sport, only out of necessity. If I desired a religion, WHICH I DON'T, it would be that of indiginous people, who did not add dogma to their teachings.

Only songs by Elvis.........I appogize.... a mundane answer.....things are usually sacred to me only. And to expect anyone else to consider them so, I think would be irrational.