Agnostic.com

9 5

"As he has made very clear, Richard Dawkins would far rather have dealings with an honest-to-God Fundamentalist than with anyone who would make an argument for the accommodation of religion by science lovers. There is a particular place in his hell for those like Stephen Jay Gould and Michael Ruse who give any ground to the enemy. We are charter members of the Neville Chamberlain school of thinkers, so named after the pusillanimous British prime minister who tried to do business with Adolf Hitler."

(Michael Ruse, in "Atheism. What everyone needs to know" )

Matias 8 Aug 17
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

9 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Compatiblism - I don't think so!

1

I certainly understand where he's coming from. You can point at fundamentalists and say "see?" And most people will see the crazy. It's the same people defending them for some reason that really puzzles me sometimes.

1

Thanks for reinforcing my low opinion of Dawkins.

1

Yeah, I like Dawkins also. He's pretty smart and cool.

0

Just a load of rhetoric blurb to me but my observation is the absurd cliche that is trotted out by speakers wishing to place fear into the hearts of Christian believers: this ‘special place in hell’. It’s always given a context as if it has some divine authority

I can’t find it’s original reference and all I can imagine is that it is a nod to The Divine Comedy.

Any ideas anyone?

That could be it! Maybe put them in level nine, the worst one at the bottom where the traitors are, or ask God to create an even worse one for Christian sympathisers. I think Dante got the idea of the levels of Hell from the Muslims.

0

Just perpetuates division. Even intelligence doesnt immunize us to this. Science only measures what is measurable. Everything isn't. It proves nothing, but shows correlations. Confounds invisible.

2

Richard is wrong, I think. Religion's power is diminished but it isn't going away. I think accommodation is needed for two things: the ecology because the religious think the solution to ecology lies in God's kingdom, and the Western world isn't taking up humanism as the alternative to faith values.

3

A particular place in his hell? Dawkins' hell?

4

I do not see why some atheist see the need to refer to gurus like Dawkins and others. I do not see the need to look to others to tell me what to do. That is what happens in most religions. To me, my atheist is a personal matter, and I have no need to try to escape my freedom.

What I escaped is the "freedom" that religion thinks it offers. It was only then that I had real freedom.

@DenoPenno I agree. That is why I do not need to look to gurus for justification for my personal decisions.

This guy hates RD 😂 And anyone who does not see the value of religions in science . Ok ! Apparently thou , he is not big fan of homosexuals either , he can study them , write book about them , but the negative reviews About his attitude are juuust great ! 🤢

Even Freethinkers have leaders.

@dare2dream I have read widely on many topics and issues and have studied multiple disciplines. I admire some thinkers and writers and have incorporated some of their thoughts into my own. But, I do not consider any of them to be my "leader."

@wordywalt Nor do I.

If atheism is ever to become a movement for secular progress and freedom, it will need to coalesce around leaders or it will fail like the Occupy Wallstreet movement which was leaderless and a totally flat organisation (disorganisation).

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:390225
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.